Salt Lake Herald-Republican | 1901-02-05 | Page 7 | Who Was to Blame?

WHO TO T BL MEP County Surveyors Opinion dinion of Power County Surveyor te submitted his report t ty commissioners tir u fh at In In the de tr Olt at the Ute north of or il C jn his Judgment the tha n by bythe the Ute water ces cesIn in the rock rUck and end working down don until t forced it ft out and carried carrle l 1 masses of r under the he t bridge The tn Ineer stilts states fits HS in i n bis Jais al report that the was mt lot lined I except wIth hydraulic cement C pt TIte effect if r the th pressure after r the watt Wat had ted the crevice ere I would be boo beabout beabout about eighty pounds pressure t to the th foot on oh the rock In his Judgment the geometrical fault falt exists along this thin particular pan lular tuft diff that It can an be e traced on both bot h sides aides hl s f the tunnel but might not nut have ha H been et Y detected det ted from within the tunnel at the tine tinie it was constructed He Ht also calls attention to the fact tact that other rock in the vicinity In m no way connected with Ith the crack are in dan of fall in inThe The report does not attempt to fix the responsibility but it is generally generaH conceded that it is more favorable fa Ora ble to 1 i i the power company than thun the tb report t i filed Hied by the special engineer engineers Bostaph and Simmons The commissioners did J not consider cOlI ider the report but d bi h honor of John Marshall day They I will take it up this thIB morning The regular meeting of the city coOn coun council cit cil last night was quite brief and wee was consumed with th routine business in including eluding committee reports and minor matters matter It was stated SUited that the street supervisor o shall ahall employ a watchman t to j guard the gravel crave pit and aDd charge cha 10 Ie cents a load for or every nery load of gravel grael or sand taken away The supervisor is also to visit vt Salt Lake and purchase material to repair the street sweeper