Show A CARD CAJU FROM PROM L I J r STEWART To the Editor of ot The Herald My attention was called this evening to an aa affidavit of one W V P Willis of or Garfield county Utah la In lathis InI I this mo sings Ain Tribune charging JIM me with showing him an aD affidavit the roD lIon contents tents of which in substance is that Judge Jud McCarty had prejudged certain cases calm that might come before hint should he te be reelected and aDd had mad deter determined determined determined mined the penalties he be would inflict I and that he bad had used u profane language against a majority of the voters of the district I state tate most emphatically that the charges charge cha made in the affidavit of Mr I Willis are untrue I admit having in my say possession po an Aft affidavit setting forth utterances of oC I Judge Jud e McCarty to certain r mons mona in this city and ad that the affidavit shown Mr lIT Willis win was called forth by reason of ot his telling why he had settled I In the town of and which I was waa to the effect that Olat be he had been an and h his s conversation led to the calling of a grand and p jury in Panguitch some seine time timO ago by bJ b Judge Mc McCarty McCarty McCarty Carty and an of his charging It regarding unlawful cohabitation offenses I IThe The affidavit I have was as given me to counteract and offset stories circulated here by certain persons persona working for the I II election e of Judge McCarty McCart to the ef effect I feet that the church authorities desired his reelection because of the good he heI had done dOBe the Mormon people and also that the Judge had shown letters to I that effect Had it not been for the methods em employed employed employed by those supporting Judge Mc Me McCarty 11 Carty the affidavit referred to would never have been made but since Bince de tie despicable methods were resorted to for forthe forthe forthe the purpose of defeating my election I Iwas Iwas Iwas was under the necessity to protect my myself myself self elf against nat them L J I STEWART I have bave seen mali t and anti read the affidavit held by Mr Stewart and have com corn compared compared pared the contents thereof with that of C CUe the Ue affidavit of Mr Willis contained in inthe inthe Inthe the Tribune and they are entirely dif different different different ferent I was wu present on the occasion referred to by Mr MI Willis as set forth in inthe inthe the tM statement t of 01 Mr fro Stewart and the he be remarks remark of Mr Willis Villi leading up to the showing of the affidavit are as set forth by Mr I Stewart in the foregoing lette Iette JOSEPH ECKERSLEY Richfield ld Utah Oct 30 |