Show MR JUl LAIOr l o OFFICE Denies That IDs His Employees Are His Eis HisT Tools T n answer anti and a replication were st flied filed in the United States Staten inuit In the case cane In which Im m pl Mrs Martha A Rounds is In for an from P H II Hl l Lannan e C C Goodwin William R Km Ji is K E P Gaylord the Tribune Job Printing company and th ti t Tribune Printing Publishing tx This puts p i 1 D i ast 1St tS at u issue and it now ready to tobe be bet 16 t for trial i in n addition to t asking for an I Ing Mrs Irs Rounds seeks to have ha a re I oio rip appointed for the job printing 1 claiming that it is Insolvent nt II ni that th t in the hands of Mr Lawman mid the other defendants deft whom she hums to be his tools the affairs aaI of tf e the I are being carried on n in a highhanded high I h handed d manner to her she sheI shea i I f IK a stockholder to the extent ext nt of I ri i mi The defendants d in ther th r answer affirm that Mrs Rounds has bas been a stock II h Ii i iler lor ince since the job printing company Ia a organized in io 1891 Mrs Rounds I I hiving bin nine received ived ninety Chares ures of stock in ill r mm for worth of machinery 4 0 ne hundred and oth rr r f hares Chares halE were ere issued one th the pliant alleges allf gt s to P H IL Lan nail one to t C C C Goodwin C vIn I ai 1 tw l 1 remaining r to the tbt Tribune I n Publishing company any It Iti I j i that Mr L Lannan annan owns ons the I 1 stok in the latter corpora ti tin n hut hilt it is denied that he be exercises j I H hy undue unitie authority in the job printing I I t or r frn i rn Though the other defendants I Iii i it ii i Associated with Mr in the j juh lul company it is that ih 1 they UP II re his instruments or tools or I that thai nt hi his till vill iII p i is law with them The le Je lei i n daim that they have given imi nuh h of f their time to the job printing t without compensation They that the concern is In debt and andt t it an indebtedness to the publishing o for rent light etc but do if i the job printing company sh nt and allege that a reever r 1 II I IM h injurious to its welfare |