Show DIGNITY OB OE COURT COUT DISTURBED Judge Howat Howat and Attorney Staup Have Kayo a Wordy Scrap In Court CourtIn Cou In the case cs of o Joseph Joeph F Potter Poter vs YS the Ajax Mining company which was the sec see second j jond Ax ond end case on the supreme court curt calendar I Ito to come before that august augst Body yester yesterday yeter yesterday day Judge Howat and Judge Powers ju junior junior junior partner Attorney D Newton ewton had a 1 passage at arms armR or as a near it as a was permissible p before the te bar br of or the highest highet court curt of the state The eminent jurist jurs who halls hals from the theland theland land lard of BurnS Burn Burn has ha a a good god deal del of the Scotch quickness of temper which all aU his legal life le and training have bave only smother smothered ed NI without aD entirely extinguishing and e Attorney is the kind kind of lawyer who never takes take any back talk from op opposing posing counsel When the th two met on op opposite posIts sides of the case the tension tenon though held hl in abeyance wa in evidence just the same ame ameThe me meThe The cord snapped when Judge Howat made a reflection on the firm of Powers Powe Staup LIppman Lt derogatory to that trios conception n ol of o legal lel ethics ethic and nd good faith was w on his feet in a mo me moment moment ment ment boiling boin over with wih indignation aton Ho He Hered reed read red from front the court ourt record a certain certin pas passage pa paI passage Into the I sage which carried carrie time the Ue battle battIe batte camp The Th Mr threw at the firm fr of Bennett Howat Harkness Harkes Sutherland Van Cott Cot CotI raised ill all al the Scotch in il Judge JUdg Howat I and he indignantly refuted refute Mr I What Mr was wa hinting at was wa not perfectly clear but mt It i Ivits plain enough that thu It 1 w some fome matter that en entirely enI r I concerned Judge Howat and not noti i his firm Mr had made the as assertion assertion that certain certin testimony had come mome comeI tat from front the lips Ups of f the te plaintiffs p witness withes witheS I Judge Judg Judg Howat repelled the te insinuation ion in his characteristic way |