Show I i COLORADO FUEL IRON CO IN SUIT WITH WALKER BROTHERS OVER CLAIMS Taking At t testimony te was wa begun un ter 8 d da In a wit suit which is 18 b pert rt of or a quiet warfare being MotU carried on between rival Iron interests In IB southern Utah ta ll Osten Ostensibly sibly It to Is formal format action begun In the tit fed federal federal federal eral court l bY r the Iron Mining company to quiet title to tu the th Adams and Armstrong claims in Iron count county The lh nominal defendants In one sUIt nult are a Dun Duncan Duncan Duncan can J lerew 11 and C 0 O Mow Moss In the theother theother I other they are ue Matthew Vik tk and UT t 1 r 1 Tones The actual plaintiffs are thi I Walker Valker alker Bro wile coDers l practically all ski the stork stock in the tolor company I The Th real al defendant in lu both suits suite is lIS the I Colorado Fuel A Iron company om paiR Although only two claims claim alm ar l lIn II in these the e suits a similar situation exists with Ith a number of or others o the and a decision t I favorable to lo the Uie Colorado Fuel Iron company Is likely to result in wholesale Kle litigation The rIle Walker HIker claims were pat patented p t tent ent 1 as placers years agoV ago At a It com corn comparatively comp p recent ent date the agents a of or the Colorado company covered some om of or the th same ground round with lode locutions locations The company I be a attorneys o Frederick 11 i I I ug ton bit f Denver n and r tl Smith li of r Salt Lake maintain that even though were issued on the thit placer hu r claims claim the tIlt action tIo I is If Irregular because lodes of or orI I mineral minerai were known at that time to ex cx exist I let lat on the ground Andrew H wat watami and ami Dickson Ellis Kills Bills udie attorneys for tor forthe forthe the Walker Bros maintain that tin HIP tit ac action kc e elion I I lion tion in granting tho th patents was final 1 The taking of ot testimony before Referee I Lewis IcIa is likely to last several leveral days |