Show I I I i I WRITS RAIN ON JUSTICE DURAND Warm Time for Presiding Gen GenIUS jus IUS of Murrays Kan Kangaroo Kangaroo Court I SPICY AFFIDAVIT IS FILED LITIGANT ASSAILS COURT AND COLLECTION AGENCY It fairl fairly ruined mined writs of certiorari in Murray yesterday and Charl Charis s F Du Durand Durand rand the purveyor of Murray justice was the recipient of the storm three notices being served upon him to show cause to the district court why judg judgments judgments ments entered by him should not be set aside The first writ was that applied for by Alexander Burt BurL It was flied filed Tuesday and taken out by Deputy Sheriff Sharp Jn n the morning Then came a similar application for review from A Amund so on and this was served early In the afternoon by Deputy Sheriff White The third was that of Nell and that was served by Deputy Sheriff Sheri Steele iI l I guess we will wiH have to keep a deputy deputy ty In Murray especially for this pur purI purpose pose commented Sheriff Emery when the writ came in inIn inIn In the tho affidavit tiled filed with his application application cation for a rit of review Amundson scores tine the Luke collection agency which uses the Murray court for its debt collections He says that Stude Studebaker baker bake Brothers Brother placed a 49 4 account In hands w lL knowing the irre irregular ular pernicious and unlawful moth meth methods adopted ly by the said Francis G Luke in unlawfully annoying harrass lug and subjecting persons to great In inconvenience convenience and ana hardship by hasing haing summoned to appear to answer to causes over which the tribunal Issuing such uch s summons have no power to speak Respects to Durand He thell takes tip up Durand DUIm in hardly less complimentary terms saying that h lie well knowing the methods and practices of said Francis G Luke un undertook undertook without an any evidence whatsoever ever eyer that said justice court had june juris jurisdiction diction in time the cases to render judgment against the plaintiff herein It from the papers in the case that July 12 1905 Amundson was was made defendant In an action brought by Studebaker Brothers for 49 together c er with 20 attorney fees and costs Again on March 28 he was made do de fondant In a similar action for 10 and 1810 costs In both Instances lie he con contends contends tends judgment was rendered against him notwithstanding the fact that the justice court was without jurisdiction as lie he did not live Jive In the Murray dis district district Demurrers Demurrer Is Ignored Durand apparently proceeded along different lines in th tho case On Feb 9 an action was commenced in the Murray court by William R B For Forsythe the against Ic man and according to th tile affidavit the complaint was fled fied Summons was served on the do de defendant 1 Salt Lake Lalee and h employed Moyle lo le Van Yan Cott as his attorneys who fil flied d a demurrer alleging lack Jade of jurisdiction This was tiled filed with Du Durand rand and as a the for the writ says said justice wrongfully and unlawfully and with the Intent of ren rendering dering an unlawful judgment against said defendant did not Indorse upon said demurrer the date of filing or did not mark the same Filed and neg to enter the filing of this demur demurrer In his docket the demurrer was still pend pending pending ing and on March 1 last Durand en entered entered judgment in favor of Forsythe for with 40 costs and on Jul July 9 issued tin nn which was placed in till tue hands of the sheriff The petitioner asks that the action of Durand be reviewed by the district court |