Show I I DISTRICT COURT NOTES 1 Sylvester Slester Walker yesterday esterdaY brought an action against Joseph G Wilkes administrator ad administrator administrator of the estate of Andrew Pet Pettit Pettit Pettit tit to recover The plaintiff alleged al alleged alleged that he cared for Pettit for seventeen seven seventeen seventeen i teen years after atter 1865 providing him with bed board and clothing and education of the reasonable value alue of ol and that when Pettit went to the state penitentiary penitentiary the plaintiff sent him tobacco and notions of ot the value of Pettit died on Aug 27 7 1907 No Ko attention was paid to the plaintiffs demand on the admin administrator adminIstrator administrator for the liquidation of ot these claims The supreme court yesterday esterday reaffirmed Its previous ruling in tn the case of Walker alker I Brothers bankers respondents against i L G appellant The action was to recover 1 0 on an overdraft from C Co in which the tho defendant arid and others were Interested The lower court rendered Judgment for the defend defendant defendant defendant ant In August the supreme court remanded re reo remanded i the case caJe for a new trial tria but granted a new hearing This resulted yes yesterday yesterday es esterday in the affirming of the first opinion opinIon opinion I ion of the supreme court courts i The amount am of taxes collected up to last i night was approximately approximate The precise total will not be known until the amounts have nae been added It is the opinion opinion opinion ion of the county treasurer that fully tully 73 is isper per cent of ot the taxes have been paid |