Show WHITE BULLDOG FIGURES IN A ROW Several SeverI Witnesses Give the Dog Bog a aBad aBad aBad Bad Name but Owner Ownership Ower Ownership ship Is in Doubt Doubt Friendship ties te are arc slack shack between the families famie of ot George Geor e Mover Moyer lIo er and J V W Hoo Hooper j Jer per er both occupying the house bouse at 3 South Second East street First there was a coolness then a real chill chi then snubbing and now evidently the open opel hostility Is being tried on the dog d g At any rate it is isa Isa isa a canine alleged to be owned O ed by the Moy Moyers Moyers oy ers and which seems to be the object of or especial dislike on the part of the Hoopers that has brought the feud into the court courtroom courtroom courtroom room air all and is causing Judge DIehl to toi i wearily ask Why hy Is a dog dol anyway y The Moyers occupy the front part of ot the house while the rear is inhabited by the Hoopers bloopers According to Mrs Hooper blooper the Moyers keep a white bulldog that is I of a vicious nature On the stand she told of how hoW the dog dol had bad bitten bien her on the hand last June and again agin on last Wednes Wednesday Wednesday ednes day had attempted to bite bie her On cross examination Mrs Hooper could not tell tel whether the tile Moyers were the owners of or orth the th dog or not but thought they were since she had seen them Ulem feeding it Mr Hooper blooper also thought the dog dos was wa vicious and that It belonged to Mr I Moyer but want sure sur William Ilam Foung a driver of a delivery deliver wagon related how one day when delivering goods to Mrs Hooper the dog had attacked him and grabbed him bin by b the leg Ie He was so scared that he was afraid to go out the gate ate ahead of the dog and followed it instead The ef et effect effect feet of or Clyde Parsons testimony was largely largel lost Jost on Clyde who is a mere boy told how the dog doS had nabbed nabbe him by b the tIre shoe one day but later admitted that the matter mater of oC his hi tes testimony testimony had been talked ov O over r with Mr 11 and Mrs Hooper During his too Mrs Irs Hooper sitting beside him did considerable coaching from the sidelines By this time it had bad been dl discovered covered by b the prosecution that the ownership of ot the dog had not been established and a re recess re recess cess was taken while Patrolman Pat olman Harris Haris was secured He could only say that some eight or nine months ago a o Mr Moyer Moer told him that he owned the dog Attorney torne Smith for the defense made a motion for a nonsuit on the tile ground that no evidence had been ben introduced introduce to show that the dog spoken of ot was owned owed by Mr Moyer foyer at the tile time alleged In the com complaint om com complaint plaint Perhaps weary eary of or the dog talk Judge Judg DieM Diehl reserved his bis decision until today toay |