Show SKEEN SEN FIXED IN PURPOSE PU Proceed Against Councilmen Coun Probably Two City Officials in Addition J D Skeen the attorney who brought ht the actions against several councilmen co toward their removal from office the alleged misappropriation of the funds states that ne will go after whole bunch now holding office who members of that body when the were made He expressed as being pleased with the supreme decision because it proved that his was right Seven Seve months ago he continued I these men that I would remove them office If It they failed to resign I in to keep my word Accusations have en filed against Craig Moyes and With Chambers out of t the way will leave but Emmett against whom need to file an accusation and this will forthcoming at once unless he presents I resignation If the opinion of the su court covers the ground I think it It is not at all unlikely that I will charges against two additional city cit and do my best to make them the office they now hold Mr Skeen did not say who these officers I but it is understood that one of is City Attorney J E Bagley B gley who a written opinion in which he is said have hae sanctioned the action of the th cOWl coun in making the th appropriation n The other is believed to be that of City Re W J Critchlow The special au committee in its report of the ex cx of the th city books stated that official had charged 5 per month montIi for work and then at the end of the made a second charge covering the work The attention of Mr Skeen been called to this matter and he be I in hi all probability probe further into case Mr Skeen admitted that friends of one the councilmen had approached him re his further furth r action regarding the against the other councilmen When I if he was willing to show sh w any le he toward ony of those accused he When a man is licked it is no time compromising I gave these men all opportunity they needed before the were filed They failed to advantage of it then I see no rea rca why I should be asked to drop their now I |