Show R POSITION t s th i g s toi to Live Liv i In 3 Glass ass HoUses S What eod reason Is there wb Pros dent dont Roosevelt should have hae the I privilege of chan ng his hb mind as oft n as he will wUl without be lug raised whIle Judge Parker amY other cannOt PresIdent Roosevelt has no scruples In hi charging his opponents with Insincerity Tere Is tl a saving about persons who live Ui fn glass houses which he h and Republicans would do wen well to bear in mind Xo No public man In the United States hasa record W which should make him more about charis moral mora aI or weak upon those Who vho are no now advocating II COUrses opposed to those they formerly stood for forThe The Rc Republican followIng th the presidents lead are arc d dilating II aU a as B Sen Senator ator Foraker dId In Chicago o on satur Saturday n non I on the possibility that the Democratic party ma may o In sop combination of clr return to the advocacy or of a free coinage ot of silver and a bIm currency based on sliver Instead of gold I There Is little more reason for believing I Jt It than or for believing that the party part would do It and do it quickly if po conditions should make It appear profitable In a partisan way ny The Re Republican Republican publican party was rescued so 50 as by ike from attempting to make the people be lIve that it was just as good a silver party as the Democratic party was The country is sun still by bl What Jt It for silver before its desperate con conversIon conversion versIon Much is made In Republican writing am talk or of the e that Judge Par ker did not break with his p party r on the nomination of Bran 1 twIce voted for him Ills His fault of conformity to party iu U this r do doo p lii in III o obliquity with ith that Roos elt and Lodge tn in s standing b by the thc Republican party after toe the nomination of Unies s es they misrepresented themselves thov had bd be for man many that Mr 11 was wag a corrupt publIc ma anti and that lila I lJ election to the presidential would dIshonor theIr party and the Yet when h n 11 he was as nominated thy ae e him not merely passive but active sup cut support port Mr Roo lt aking the stump for Tor him Surely this ma ought to b be tIO to find fault with anybOdy for support t in his party when the candidate is not L a desirable one Still less ess i l ho intimate that such support must be betaken betaken taken ns as Proof root of of arty any pe I eullar Ideas idess or OJ conduct ot of the an II Judge Parkers vote for Br Bryan nn was not evidence that he personally favored Bry i or certainly no mort mors evidence than was Mr 11 ote olo for Blame Blaine I that lie approved o of corruptIon In polities This Is not sa saying ing that Mr Blame Blaine was i corrupt but that Mr Roo then be hIm to be there Is no question I whatever I 1 |