Show i HEIRS TW TAKE STEPS 1 TO TOi THWART WIDOW I Move Made in Walker Will WillI Case to Hold Securities in inthe ini inthe I i the State NEW PHASES DEVELOPED I I S H n ef IB II I Named Special i Administrator fey by the tile District I I i Addition court proceeding in an p f j attempt t to brak break the th will wH of the th late I I avid d F K ore Here re begun bo emer tr ii f i thy in III tt the Third li 1 and re rO resulted r rJ J j In I the tl ti ti i of It f I David avld F Fj FI j I alker a sen 11 o t hI y it ti fir t 1 wife of Ua 1 I t i I Id ht 1 H k Ik d d ax all a special ad adI adV V j of t lie estate tat tatt 11 t I f In ID cut cu IK tg the ti II hurt un appoint appointing 0 ing ti ia lai the Ih al at allegation ali att i legation aLtoe ui t thai lIha Walker Walkr t of ot o I t and aDd who ho is I Imade made wad in n the lh uil suii to break g the will is I i to I leae le eave the th state Mate tk I a ti hr her i i lIllon more j than Ihan i ini df f t negotiable securities l belonging i u the be h now in dis disI 1 i I I Th m ii 11 turn in ill the l 1 I t alker I c COt CC e i Ia th t I h i third hird t court ourt chapter tU n i nr nt ul of f I tah nut notable Mill ill ii c ca Soon I after Ui tb i h of tf I l F 0 Maker a Kr In inI I 1 Halt alt it Lak LaI pember jiember ember 11 tin tI year ear I I If hen at 1 i 1 came known that under a Ii 1 recent li 1 the decedent hal be te bequeathed iII all In Iii estate elate at II Sl 1 MM 5 iH t co hi hl second co lid wit Aithea Walker anI nd id two 10 Mar MarKar MarL MarI I Kar art l W J r smoot and H I Walker Walkr hildren of Mr c r first firm man MA through Sin Mra Sarah A At AI t I Paul aul a daughter 01 tr of ot the first firt union unton f l brought suit mi In lu the th district distrct court ourt t tt h break brask th tb w wiH iii Ii I The of the first union of f Mr Walker WIker had haa practically lly teen bell cut cutoff off itt ff without M a penny vay and aad it was a al alleged allec i 1 lec that this I h i had hd been due to 10 the I h I I 4 tc influence of the second f wife A AItha a The suit was mas 9 Ii 01 transferred to In the th federal court as the greater buik bulk f the th he property properly of t il th he heI e I estate U III i II I I to III i l Ift n Piled Y iii eer F Walk Walker alk t er one 00 of 01 th t as tin tIe tI child i of t f the and his hi fire wife wit filed a petit petH u n Lii III i h district court I A I alleging that thai Ih a Walker and the two I wo children Margaret arI Walker Smoot I C L I and d Clarenc nc alker Valker had wrongfully taken po J O seti s In n of ut upwards of ul I to 10 the of ot J l ii D f j 5 Walkr during the of I th tb the suit ault brought h hy Mr Mrs Sarah A Paul Pauland PaulI I I and thai that th the thi II rt n about bou to leave the I 1 tate Mate and g C the Ibe jurisdiction 4 of the I he court Tb NT for tur the Ih order for the th i Appointment PJ of ut hand F Walker as IU lecial Ial lor wa ws made mad before bt S Judge Jude If M L The Th a pi bowel that a e tare lal portion of ut the tilt es estate est S t I tate tale of the tha du nl was WS in fl Ilah eon con 01 I of 01 In the nIt of 01 off II f Wales ale lil group croup t f loue luU mining claims In Inthe Int InI t the I h His Big Cotton Cetton wood od mining district i and other oth r r rn realty and credit in cash I payable on check k with Ith Walker alk Hros I It I t bank to 10 the an of ut 3 o o a as well wella ell ella 11 a other negotiable I I The Thc petition t averred that lallY of ut I 1 the tue papers 11 ii ing the Ih proper rr I Suit and title to II e properties ro an aYt r in ill the Ih of ot AIthra I tha W liter r and it itI 4 as Ii averred hI I l him m that it II in Is her hr in intention inI I to ie r i lie h slate late I I It was wan as alao lao 1110 averred a erred that although the I i I I decedent nt left B a will it has haa ha not nt yet yel yelI yetI et I been I n for fir probate c n t i Another Iha e this Ihla li hee t e of the th ta race alt e wa was as be benik b nik 1111 brought f rth h in ill the district court move was being made in It ii the I he i federal i h Mrs Mr Sarah A Paul PaulI I c h her attorney rny who question questioning T ing ni I II claim caim Ia it I the Ih tate laie 11 If U D I F V Walk ilk ft ei Cl left ln no nu prot rt in Utah Itah the federal court urt f tr fr r an all order bringing Al AlI 1 a of the he deceased d I II a 1 Walker w ilo 1 I n chief chit heir or of the thc Ih estate Into InlO court p 1 examination retarding regarding the th affi affidavit It JI overruled by byJ davit in iD question was Mas 1 Jud J di fe J A tr hall un he the ground sund that HIli I there U is government law per permitting if such at stion non noni i till in III the MUM e ground the court sus sustained lU the defendants motion to t va vacate Vacate cate the orV r previously uh entered atred for forthe forI forthe the I II taking of deposition In the state I courts urt t Following the filing of ot the tbt uit in ill Ml tl w hid Sarah srah A Paul charged that thaI Al At l thea hilI Walker Wak r had bad practiced clairvoyance ance all on her to secure his hU en ell entire enI I t tire lire t i r property the widow filed affi affidavits davits h Us to t the th effect that Walker left i i no Ho property In tn Utah and moved lovei for forthe J I I the lla appointment of nf Carl l rl W us ail aill 1 J administrator l of M left lett ii ill 1 San SItU Ma Matco alro leo county California mla |