Show l SU COURT OURT CALENDAR CAL I t S There are cases c ses on the su an supreme preme court calendar for the October term t rm which commences Oct OctH 1 14 Of Ot these thee only two are appeals from verdicts In criminal cases they being In the case of the state against Arthur A thur Brown found guilty of forgery and A T Day con convicted convicted convicted o murder In the first degree and sentenced to be shot Both are set for ar argument argument the first day of the term The remainder of the cases are of little Importance to tbs general public and con consist consist mostly ot of private litigation The calendar Is as follows October r 14 State of Utah respondent vs Arthur Brown appellant State of Utah respondent vs A T Day appellant John S Houtz appellant vs Union Pa Pacific Pacific Railway Co respondent October 15 In the matter matt r of the application of Don C Fullmer et al ale to t restrict the tha limits f of f the town of ot Mapleton A R Ro C Smith appellant vs VII Ogden Northwestern Railway company respondents dents S October 15 Asenath Chadwick appellant vs J 1 H HArnold HArnold Arnold Arnol et ct etal al respondents W V H Bentley y appellant vs A Bos Bossard Bossard sard et al respondents Peter Anderson respondent vs VI Mam Mammoth Mammoth Mammoth moth Mining company appellant October 17 1 Jonanna Brixen respondent vs Soren X Jorgensen et al appellants W C Carter respondent vs VB The Cum Co appellant J 1 H Dearden respondent vs San Pe Pedro Pero dro ro Los Angeles Salt Lake Railway Rall y company appellant October IS 18 I 1 IC C S Price respondent vs Western Loan Savings Co appellant John Jobe Prye Frye respondent vs Perry Kal Kalbaugh Kalbaugh Kalbaugh baugh et ct al appellants Elizabeth Lund appellant vs J JF F Wit Wll I cox respondent I I October 21 1 4 Almira Lewis respondent vs ys Mam Iam Mammoth 1 Mammoth moth Mining Co appellant appellantS S In the matter of ot o the estate of Branch Young deceased Jesse Gesas by his hi guardian aJ al litem appellant vs Oregon Short Line Railway company respondent October 22 2 Nephi Plaster r Manufacturing Co re respondent respondent vs Juab county appellant I Spencer Clawson respondent tvs ys s I A Clayton and Clayton Claton Investment company appellant John Bowman respondent vs Ogden City appellant October 23 In the matter of the petition of Alex I Barton and others of Mantl Nanti City William Jones respondent res vs so John I Blythe appellant appellantS S J 1 Palmer respondent vs S the Oregon Short Line Railway company appellant October 24 S Emeline Spiking et al respondents vs Consolidated Railway Power company com pan panet ct et al appellants Manti ManU City Savings Bank Bahk respondent vs Niels Peterson et at al at appellants A F Acord respondent vs A L Booth et al a appellants October 25 N W Clayton respondent vs H M 11 Dinwoodey et at at appellants Lettle Lettie A Brown respondent vs Salt Lake City appellant Emil Emit respondent vs VB C Emery appellant October 2 25 S James A Luke appellant vs 5 Israel Bennion administrator respondent J J Brummit et al at appellants vs Ogden Waterworks company and Ogden City respondents State ex rel reI R B J 1 Robinson respond respondent ent vs Charles Durand appellant |