Show I I II SHARP RETORTS IN DIVORCE CASE Greenhalgh Trial Brings Attorneys Attorneys Attorneys and Witnesses to Sword Points I Whether hether Henry Greenhalgh was bly Ny ejected from his home by his Irate wife and told never neer to return or whether she pleaded with him to stay after atter he lie had bad made known his Intention to vacate with such fervor that his little daughter refused to repeat the language langua e he used ud is ig the principal Issue In the divorce suit brought by br Nora Greenhalgh against Henry Hem Greenhalgh on trial yesterday aft afternoon afternoon before forc Judge George G Arm Armstrong strong str ng The appear to have bave had a varied matrimonial career Married the first time a number of o years ears ago divorced and remarried in Denver again in 1902 lOO and anel now in the divorce court again IH is In brief brict the history of ot their efforts to love loc one another According to Mrs Irs Greenhalgh she hc has hasie led ie l anything but a pleasant life lire since her remarriage For three winter months she says sas she lived In the outskirts of the city eft In a tent and had to work to sup sun port herself and little daughter When hen asked on the witness stand when she was married m the last time she said Keep Track They say it was in the spring of ot 1902 and Iguess I 1 guess that is right although I 1 al always always ways thought that It was gas in the fall of that year You see seeh I dont have time to keep track of or such sue things Was Vas the tent comfortable asked At torney Marks representing the husband No it was not fit for or a human being to live livo in let alone a woman was the thes s sharp harp reply It seems that the final separation came at Bingham September 10 lOCO 1005 Asked concerning the events leading up to it she said Well Vell sir he just packed up his things and left He was very abusive but I 1 did not order him out as he says There was no ordering about it he just left I 1 asked him to stay but lie be did not seem to think well of ot it Keep Attorneys Guessing I could get et along all right if he lie had acted half halt decent decent He lie abused me and I could not endure It You say lIa he gambled How do you ou know It asked Mr Marks Mark What do you ou consider knowledge any anyway an anway anyway way was the tart reply Little Margaret Greenhalgh twelve years old proved a good witness for her mother What did your father say when he left Z she was asked I wont tell was the sharp reply which fairly floored Attorney Marks When asked If she had been coached by her her mother or Attorney Frank B Scott Beott as 8 to what to say sal 11 she sh replied r with even more vigor No I know what to say Nobody has to tell me meThe meThe meThe The case was continued until December r 24 in order to secure further evidence |