Show HER MEMORY JS IS J NOT VERY GOOD Mrs Maybrick Testifies Test ies in the Big Bigland BigLand BigLand land Suit AVOIDS DIRECT ANSWERS HAS AN INTEREST IN N PROPERTY IN DISPUTE Washington March laTch 20 The teti testimony testimony mony of ot Mrs Florence l Maybrick Ia In the taking of depositions in the case casc of her 1 r Baroness von on Roques against Da Ij 1 1 1 W V Armstrong and others In l filing hg valuable tracts of or lands Jand in Virginia Vest West Virginia and Kentucky Kentuck as concluded con today to ay lr Maybrick displayed marked ca H for avoiding direct answers to th rigid questioning to which she was tul She declared with ith respect to tho signing of certain papers in hi prison iI Wre ore brought brou t to her herb by Counsel P Pl tor that she was w s so o imperfectly In Into Int r to t wd as to the communications that p t r il 1 between bet we n Mrs and her that she simply signed the doc docu u cr ts without any an clear knowledge of or the transaction on Upon being pressed pressede for f e a more direct answer Mrs May la in tn ic lC insisted ill isted that when she he signed the j I lit u rs she he did not know the nature of hIr i Could Not Remember produced a a number of ot Jf TS 15 purporting to have been boen written b ITT mother Mr lIr Potter Poter and anti others I t tr r and during her Imprisonment ment but h expressed f her hier inability to Iden Identify tit ti hf hc handwriting of any anyone one of six tf n yEars fars ars ago c impression of or my nl mothers ra ha prior to my release she sheI I 1 is too dim for me to identify ti y any letter hetter She would not state f U c to the best of her knowledge and andI I tf f r that the letter shown her b r had If b witten s itten by her mother saying t i t a statement of that kind would be beto beten too ten definite for or the plaintiff objected to toa toa toa a 4 v stion as a to whether Mrs Maybrick Ia K ld I d ci tC d a pardon from the British J but the witness f Cautiously replied that she had hadIt hadI It I 11 s In her possession given giyen her by Ir lY British government Asked if she shew sher x r f c willing HUng w to produce them Mrs lt k replied with equal caution tit t I It thy h were not permitted to be pro V 1 t f fj 1 i at the request of the theY theA A r Y 1 t f n government Mrs Interest direct tUr f ct examination which was waSt f ci t d to hu t I one question Mrs Maybrick d ta t I 1 HIP circumstances under which I fi a a i an interest in the proper 1 t i F dispute puh saying that at her mar marT marn T j n In lr hi r mother gave gRe her he as a a V deeded eded it o 0 r hird of her property interest In 11 Kentucky Virginia and Vest West Vir i 1 and later hater assigned the same in inV V tg ig g The deed and assignment T 1 I Mrs Air Maybrick had been bean confirmed r i h r by her mother up UI to the thet theA t j i It t lay ilay by word or of or mouth in it she said seki is the agreement 11 n t now nou exists between us and she sher r hugly hi gly left the stand |