Show f TI r 1 Does Not Now Want a Rehearing of th S nt Fe Rebate C Case se Before the Commission InterState Cri J Jan Fre P RIP C lay 0 ot tie Santa Sania Po Fo d cornS com fi Is s s 1 his rel est rot fOI rota r r a hearing b re tIe the to commerce lon In the Colorado Fuel I Company rebate case HIs for this action are given by him lii in Ute the fol fOI following lowing telegram sent to the chairman or oE orth I Ithe th the commission I Since h arI lJ In the tho mat matt i tt t ot of the the New r of ew tex Mex I Ileo leo coal rates I ha have e been with notes ot of evidence already taken ann ana find I that there Is no testimony to support the I criticisms ot of the pre that 0 ha haw con 0 me m personally the most and that while there may have been technical yb 10 lations or of th the law yet as I know them to have been unintentional ana that the entire matter mattor bs 18 the subject of a pending civil action which will be heare fa a r federal court ourt r I be to tc with draw such request In regard rd to the st statement that there had been violations or of the tha law M Ir said 1 mn maUn UJ tariffs we ve with the the price Of the theoal coat oal a and hat there was nothing In the tariffs that this was the case That I ta the way those matters were cus customarily handled and ot tech fleshy eai St It led to no nor to anyone anane Thes tariffs tarUs have been ted at and have en cd a at p had the matter be to m Th The d rato sheet I nothing I less than n a dl vIsion sh et with another road The other circular was because the rats rates Included the price or of coal and th the price fluctuated The price could be learned beamed only onh from the Colorado Fuel r Iron company |