Show A IT ACKS PASTOR BROWN City Judge Accuses Baptist Preacher of Lying and Perjury HE DEFENDS DONALDSON JURIST WRITES RE RETORT RES RETORT S TORT TO CLERGYMAN ludge C D Diehl after Uon tiomi last night gave out a In reply to Rev D A Browa tor or of the First Baptist church The IM arose out of oC JI Jim Donaldson s arrest on ona ona a charge of promoting a t and the swearing out before J Judge e DIehl Diehi of a warrant for Rev Mr Brown on a charge o of perjury Judge Judg Diehls statement is as follows The Re Rev D A Brown Bron bas hs a asked ked and stated that he would be plea pleased ed to have haH havea a public answer to his question to mae lit ill the Tribune and Herald of l May li anti and he shall have hae It ItI I 1 do not answer anser him as a public of official tidal because acting as such I did my amY duty as I saw it but 1 deem It my duty to protect my family honor and my own against the wilful and malicious false fabe falsehood hood of any person be he be a minister of the gospel or otherwise e Mr Brown Bron has bas not been found guilty of perjury and he heIs heis Is presumed to be innocent until so found but he bas plainly demonstrated that he heis heis is a wilful and malicious falsifier bP be because caU cause C he states In his open question that I had been Informed by the superior court that if a warrant issued no prost prose cution would follow in the district court That statement its is an unqualified and un unmitigated unmitigated mitigated fal falsehood As to the question of juri jurisdiction he be was not well advised because both Mr Hanson and Loofbourow entered upon the records as counsel for the state b by their appearance and motions confessed the jurisdiction and without their ir con confession the statute makes the juri jurisdiction absolute Accuses Brown of Lying As I have stated before Mr Brown has hs shown himself to be it II determined falsifier which can be made evident to any person who maY take the time to ask any jud judge e of any court as to whether or not I was advised concerning this case caseI I 1 believed at the time the complaint was filed and tM the warrant iII issued that he had committed perjury and since having baving gone Into the fact more in detail I ant am convinced of it By issuing Ute the warrant I hoped to accomplish the punishment of ofa a jerson leison who has so 80 little respect for forthe forthe the right and liberties of oC others othen which ri right t and liberty Is guaranteed to every enryo Al American citizen re regardless of his eon un and which Is as 8 dear and to the athlete as to minister Knew Pugs Were Innocent uThe Tho fact is that the defendants whom he be contemplated ted Jaad ft t fl the crime with which they were charged and Ute the affiant well kneW it I have hae always alway 1 reproached the lawless and have deemed It my lay duty to censure them and that is the reason for the Issuance of the war aar warrant rant against the Rev D A Brown II C B DIEHL |