OCR Text |
Show Third District Court. I Proceedings in the district court on ) Friday, Chief Justice Schaefler I pr"Mih"ng: j Andrew Hay vs. George C. BuIpb; nlaiutiirs motiou to opeu depositions i granted. i C. C. Clements vsx D. Camomile et at.; jury trial; verdict for the plaintiff for$-lS2.62. C. M. Gilberson vs. Miller M. A S. ; Co.; order entered allowing deposi-i lions to be published, J. S. Lawrence vs. B. F. Butler; i continued until after the criminal calendar cal-endar is disposed of. : Frank J. Hirih et al. vs. H. B. ; Clnwson; same order.- i Frank J. Hirlh et al. vs. Johni Clark et at.; same order. Mary Admire vs. Robert T. Burton;! plaintiffs motion for judgment on tbe i pleadings overruled; leave given de-j fendant to withdraw tho amended1 anBwer, to which ruling the plaintiff! excents. James Fitzgerald vs. F. J. Hirtb; defendant's motion for a non-suit granted; plaintiff allowed five daya in which to file an amended complaint, com-plaint, Wm. J. Hooper vs. Simon Morris; by consent it is ordered that the answer be withdrawn and the judgment judg-ment of the court below affirmed. Pascoe Francis, J. P., vs. B. M. DuRell; motion of defendant to strike from the files the amended complaint was granted. Ruth E. Kinaey vs. The Missouri Valley Life Insurance company; L. Burnen entered bis appearance as attorney at-torney for the defendant, and nas allowed al-lowed thirty days in which to answer the complaint. Cora Conway u.. Jeter Clinton ct at.-, jury trial; the jury, after being out nearly thirty haurs, returned a verdict for plaintiff, and against defendants Jeter Clinton, J. D. T. McAllister, Chaa. Crow and Wm. Hyde, for $3,700 without interest: inter-est: nmcpfidinps ntavprl for rhirtv dnvt j to enable defendants to prepare and I wave motion and statement for a new : trial, and until the determination of said motion. t J. C. Patterson vs. C, Wagner elal.; 1 referred to E. T. Sprague to take tes- . timony nnd report. Wm. Wilson vs. Chicago M. & S. Co.; E. At. Barnum entered his appearance ap-pearance as attorney for the plaintiff. E. Gorlinski & Co. vs. C. W. Ells; ( jury waived and cause tried by the . court ; judgment for plaintifl for $93.11. Baskin & He Wolfe r.. Flngstafl S. M. Co.; defendants motion herein overruled, and five days giveu to ( answer. Cuurt adjourned till Saturday morning morn-ing at 9.30 o'clock. |