OCR Text |
Show Eagle Emporium. Wm. Jennings & Sum aro constantly con-stantly receiving new lots of merchandise, mer-chandise, embraciug everything in the ary goods, grocery and hardware lines. Tho interior arrangement oi the Emporium buildings has been changed recently and greatly improved. im-proved. There are now separate compartments for the different branches of the m rcin'.ile business, and all departments are completely stocked, while the prices are low. Read the advertisement in tho IIlh ald, NOTICE TO ATTORNEYS AND PARTIES. On Monday, the Dili day of April, 1S77, the call of the civil calendar for trial will be resumed in the District Court of the Third Judicial District. Not exceeding ten cases per day will be called for trial in the following order, to-wil: M. Sciiaeffeq, C. J. 1 H. W. Lawrence et al. vs. S. E. Mellin; Hempstead & Gamble; Kna-borough Kna-borough & Merritt. 2 James Spear et nl. vs. John H. Ely; Robertson & McBride; Hemp stead & Gamble. 3 Victoria Imporinl T. & M. Co. vs. John H. Ely; Rnaborough it Merritt; Mer-ritt; Hempstead it Gamble. 4 Victoria Imperial T. fc M. Co. vs. John H. K!y; Rosborougb it Merritt; Mer-ritt; Hempstead it Gunible. 5 James L. Newton ot al. vs. Wi' Ham Brown; Geo. 10. Whitney; A., Miner and Woods it Hayilon. 6 Oscar Ludwig et al. vs. Jacob T. Gove; Haydon Jk, Gilchrist: W. W. Gee. 7 John Swanoou vs. Theodort; Tangitll; S. J. Jonas-ion; Woods it Appk-by. S William H. 1'itts vs. R. C. Chambers; Haydon A Gilchrist; Hempstead it Gamble. Si Albino Williams et al. vs. Henry J. Faust; McCur.ly &, Morgan nd Robertson & McBride; no attor-:)8Vi. attor-:)8Vi. it 1 3 WHll-rn,,,,,, ,.t i t 1. u. ti nuci until ut ttl, VS. Jiifl. R. Walker el al.; Rosborougb it Merrill; Mer-rill; Baakin it DeWolfe. 10 Ueorge R. Ayros et al. vs. Jos. K . Walker e t til. ; R05 borou g h it Merritt; Bask in it DuWolfe. 11 C, W. Schafield vs. Isaac S. Watterman; Hempstead fc Gamble; Rosborougb & Merritt. VI 1. S. Watterman vs. Marcus Daley; Rosborougb & Merritt, Hempstead Hemp-stead it Gamble. 13 Jones & Hoglor vs. Job an Schneider; Haydon it Gilchrist; no attorneys. 14 Edward P. Johnson vs. Isaac S. Watterman ct al.; Robertson it McBride; Rosborougb &, Merritt. 15 Warren Huseey vs. Mason M. Hill; Marhall & Royle; Batkin it Dewolfe. 10 In tho matter of the application applica-tion of Sarah Ann Cook et al. vs. Lots 2 and 3. block S, Salt Lake City; Baskiu it DeWolfe; no attorney!: attor-ney!: 17 Jos. R. Walker et al. vs. Thoa. Taylor et al.; Bennett Jk Whitney and Patterson; Marshall .t Royle, R01-Dorough R01-Dorough and Merritt. IS John W. Kerr vs. Mathew T. Gisborn et al.; Marshall fc Royle; Rosbornugh & Merritt. 19 Mary Admire vs. Robert T. Burton; D. Cooper; Z. Snow. 20 Valle)0 T. it M. Co. vs. Alex. Tarbet et al.; Bennett it Whitney; Wood it Gee. I 21 Bmytiam C. it C. F. R. R. Co. vs. John Doe et al.; Sutherland t Bates, Marshall it Royle; Frank Hodman. 22 Nancy Taster vs. John F. lasher; woods it Uee; Til ford & Ha-an. 23 Alfred F. Cise vd. George R. Maxwell; Tii ford & Hagan; W. W. Woods. 24 Samuel L. Baker vs. W. C. Ry- dalch et al. ; W. Pottinger and Robert-1 son t McBride; Williams, Young & Shecka. 25 Euos A. Wall ot al. v-i. John W. Johnson; Hempstead it Gamble; Ro3borough it Merritt. 20 James Lee et al. va. Alex. Tarbet; Robertson it McBride; Woods it Gee. 27 Edward Theriot vs. George R. Maxwell; Robertson t McBride; Haydon. Hay-don. 28 Geo. A. Jackson vs. B. M. Du-Rell; Du-Rell; Tilford & Hagan; Hempstead & Gamble. 29 Robert T. Burton vs. Winsor, Utah, (limited) M. Co. et al.; Marshall Mar-shall & Royle; Buskin it DeWolfo. 29i Opbir Hill M. Co. vs. Isaac S. Watterman et al.; C. K. Gilchrist; Rosborougb & Merritt. 30 Geo. Pape et al. vs. Chaa. Cris-mon Cris-mon et al; D. Cooper; A, Miner. 31 Edward D. Wassell vs. Great Western 1 run Co. ; Hempstead & Gamble; Williams it Young. 32 John Sprigga vs. Ourtis B. Hawley; J. B. McKean; William3 & Young. 33 John H, Lutey vs. John W. Johnson et al.; C. K. Gilchrist; Rosborougb Ros-borougb it Merritt. 34 Mary J. Cotton vs. John F. Taster; Woods & Gi?e; Tilford it Hagan. ; 35 Edward Theriot vs. George R. Maxwell; Robertson & McBride; Gilchrist Gil-christ it Haydon. 3G James A. Varnes vs. Tbe One-oto One-oto 8. it M. Co ; O. F. SLrickland; W. Gill Mills and W. W. Woods. 37 Bimjaaiin F. Butler et al. vs. Cali.urnia B. M. Co.; Morgan & Lomax; Marshall & Royle. 3S Alexander Tarbet et al. vs. D. T. Smith et al.; Morgan, Woods it Gee; Tilford it Hagan. 39 I. S. Watterman el al. vs. Ophir Hill M. Co.; Rosborougb it Merritt; Robertson & McBride nnd Gilchrist. 40 1. S. Watterman et al. vs. Ophir Hill M. Co.; Roihorough it Merritt; UoberUon it McBride and Gilchrist. 41 1. S. Wattonnan et ol. vs. Ophir Hill M. Co.; Rosborougb & Merritt; Robertson it McBride and Gilchrist. 42 I. S. Watterman et al. vs. Ophir Hill M. Co.; Rnaborough it Merrill; Kobertsou it McBride and Gilci'.iiat. 43 1. 8. Watterman et al. vs. Ophir Hi'l M; Co.; Ronborongh & Merritt; Robertson it McBride and Gilchrist. 44 John S. Lawrence vs. B. F. Butler; Gilchrist and Brown; Robeit son it McBride and Lomax. 1 45 Alexander Tarbet vs. Flagstaff, n. Ji. Oo. et al. ; Marshall and ooJa; B-wkia ,t DeWolfe. 40 Frederick Reich vs. N. Groes-beck; Groes-beck; J. C. Heiningray; Tilford t Hagan. 47 Morris & Evans vs. P. EJward Cunnor et al.; Bate and McCutcbeon; Hempstead & Gamble. 48 Frank J. Hirlh et al. va. H. B. Clawson et al.; J. D. Lnmax; Williams Wil-liams it Young, Sheeks, Rawlins and Gilc!iri-t. 49 Frank J. Hirth et al. vs. John Clarke et al.; J. D. Lomax; Sheeks it Rawlins and Gilchrist. 50 William McQueen vs. Joho Tiernan etui.; Baskin it DeWolfe" Wm. C. Hall. 51 VV. G. Gallicher tt al. vs. Juhn Tiernan et nl.; Baskiu. & DeWolfe-Wm. DeWolfe-Wm. G. Hull. 52 Isaac Roland vs. Herman Grey et al.; Robertson it Mcliride; Gilchrist, Sheeks tt Rawlins. 53 - John L. Baldwin et al. vs. H. B. Clawson; Wm. Haydon; McKean, Sheeks & Rawlintj. 04 John L. Baldwin et al. vs. II. B. Clawson (t bI.; Wm. Haydon; SliQoks tt Rawlins. 55 Johu Tiernan vs. W. G. Gal-ligber; Gal-ligber; Wm. C. Hall; Buskin & Do-Wolfe. Do-Wolfe. 5G John L. Baldwin et al. vs. X-hn W. Gol'lthwait et al ; Wm. Haydon; McKean, Brown, Sheeks & Rawlins. 57 J. L. Baldwin et al. va, John W. Goldthwait et al.; Wm. Haydon; McKean, Sheeks it Rawlins. 58 B. M. DuRell vs. Farley B, Granger; Hempstead it Gamble; Williams Wil-liams it Young. 5y Isaac Roland vs. John W. Goldthwait et al. Robertson tt McBride; Mc-Bride; Gilchrist, Williams it Young et al. GO M jrlimer Sullivan vs. Wells Fargo & Co.; Woods it Gee: Marshall A Royle. 61 Geo. E. Whitney vs. Isaac S. Watterman; in person; Rosborougb it Merritt. G2 David Cooper vs. H. B. Clawson Claw-son etal.; Roborlson A McBride; no attorney. 63 William Wilson vs. Chicago M. &S. Co.; L. Bsthunc; C. K. Gilchrist. Gil-christ. 61-W. O. Smith vs. P. L. Brciger; K. H. Robertsuu; C. P. Huey. |