OCR Text |
Show Supreme Court Calendar. Following is the calendar of cases to come up before the Supreme court, which i:. rets on Monday: 1 The People of the Territory of Utah, respondents, ts. Samuel Games, appellant; from Third district; P T VanZile; H. F. Williams. 2 William Bringburst, appellant; vs. Utah Coal Mining and Coke Company, respondent; iron First district; J. B. Milner; J. G. Sutherland. Suther-land. 3 John P. Lawson, et al., respondent, respon-dent, vs. John W. Kerr et al., appellants; appel-lants; from Third district; J. R, McBride and Rosborough & Merritt, and Bnnett fc Harkness. A c : T-i- i-i wm iavi?, reaponaeot, m. The Flagstafl Silver Mining Company of Utah (limited) tt al., appellant; I from Third district; Bennett & Harkness; Hark-ness; J. G. Sutherland and J. R. McBride. 5 William Nelson, respondent, vs. William Clayton, appellant; from Third district; Tilford & HagaD; Z. Snow. 6 Erwin Davia, appellant, vs. J. R. McBride, impleaded with others, respondent; from Third district: Berjnelt & Harkness; J. R. McBride. 7 Thomas MoLelland, administrator administra-tor of the estate of Charles Roper, deceased, respondent, vs. Jamea T. Dickinson, et al,, impleaded, etc., appellants; ap-pellants; from Third district; VV. W. Gee and E. F. Dunne; E. D. Hoge. 8 Lucien Livingston, tt al., respondents, re-spondents, os, C. Madseu, impleaded with others, appellant; from Third district; 8. P. McCurdy; Titford &. Hagan. 9 James W. Burnham, et u respondents, re-spondents, vs. Anaon Call, et al., appellants; from Tbird district; Hoge & Jona?son and P. L. Williams; J. ti. Sutherland. 10 Samuel Kaho ct al., respondent, respond-ent, vs. Claud Hamilton el al, trustees, trus-tees, etc., appellants; from Third district; J. R. McBride; Rosborough & Merritt and J. G. Sutherland. 11 James E. Mathews, respondent,. respond-ent,. Claud Hamilton el al.; trustees, trus-tees, etc., appellants; from Third district; Bennett & Harkness; Rosborough Ros-borough & Merritt. 12 Isaac Wool, respondent, vs. Claud Hamilton et al., trustees, appellants; from Third district; J. B. McKean & Son; Rosborough & Merritt. Mer-ritt. 13 F. M. Lyman, respondent, vs. x-nocn if. Martin et al., appellants; from Third district; Sheeks & Rawlins; Raw-lins; R. N. Biskin. 14 Edward Aothony el al., respondents, re-spondents, vs. C. R. Savage, appellant; appel-lant; ;from Third district; Marshall & Royle; Hoge & Jonasson. 15 Christian Rhemke et al. respondents, re-spondents, vs. Jeter Clinton et al., appellants; ap-pellants; R. N. Baskin; Sbeeka & Rawlins. I |