OCR Text |
Show JCRY CASES. The peremptory ca'I cf the following follow-ing cases on the civil calendar of the Third district court, Utah, will commence com-mence at the court room of said court on Monday, May 12th, 1S7J). The first twelve cases will be called cn Monday and eight cases each day thereafter until Friday, the 16th of May. Philip H. Emerson, Judge. 1 Frank J. Hinh et al. vs. H. B CUwson et a!.; J. D. Lomax; C, K. Gilcbrist and Sbetki Sc Rawlins. 2 Frank J. Hirlh et al. vs. H. B. Clawson et al.; J. D. Lomax; C. K 3ilchrist and tfheeks it Rawhus. 3 Isaac Roland vs. Herman Gray et al.; Robwrtson & McBride; Sheets tfc Rawlins and C. K. Gilchrist. 4 Isaac Roland vs. John W. Goldtbwait et al.; Robertson & McBride; Mc-Bride; C. K. Gilchrist and Sheeks tfc Rawlins, 4i George W. Kinney vs. Enoch Reese et al.; C. H. Hempstead; no attoroi-ys. 5 Monroe Kling etal. vs. F. P. Longatreet et al.; Frank Hodman; S. P. Longstreet. 6 Excelsior Manufacturing Company Com-pany vs. J. N. Barker; E, P. Juhu-son Juhu-son and Z. Snow; A. S. Patterson. 7 S. Maltese, administrator, vs. B. C. and C. F. R. R. Co.; W. W. Gee and E. F. Dunne; J. G. Sutherland. 8 James W. Campbell vs. J. J. O'Reiley et al.; Bennett tfc Harkne.-B and Woods ifc Gee; TiUord (fc Hagan. 9 Isaac S. Waterman vs, John M. Wallace; Roeborough ifc Merritt; J. R. McBride. 10 Patrick Mehan et a!, vs. B. C. and C. F. R. R. Co. ; Tiiford & Hagan and Woods; J. G. Sutherland. 11 Moses Moritz vs. Thomas W. Jennings; R. !N. Bas'iin; Williams & Young. 12 Thomas Hull, sr., vs. Henry P. Gwilliam; G. J. Marsh aud S. J. Jonasson;E. D. Hogeand N. Tanner. 13 E. H. Parsons vs. Pat O'Neil; Tillord & Hagan; Woods & McKay. 14 Joseph Woouoiansee et al. ve. James Kelly et 1 ; Rosborough & Merrilt; J. R. McBride. 15 H. G. Angle vs. Wm. Neleeu; J. H. Beatty; Wbeedon, Christian fc Denney ar.d E. D. Hoge. 16 C. A. Dahl et al. vs. John W. Kerr et al.; Woods tfc McKay; Bennett Ben-nett & Harkness and Rosborough & Merrill. 17 Ezra W. Cummingsvs. W. and J. V. R. R. Co.; Williams & Young; Sutherland 6i McBride. IS t-bas. W. Schofield vs. Isaac S. Waterman; C. H. Hempslead and J. G. Su'iberland; Rosborough & Merr.lt. 19 E. M. Varnes et al. vs. F. W. Billing etal.; Bennett & Harkness; Sutherland k McBride and J, H. Beatty. 20 Dexter A. Hawkins et al. vs. John W. Kerr et al.; Jas. B. McKean & Son; Bennett fc Harknea3. 21 J. B. Diliey et al vs. Joseph Marion; E. D. Hoge; A. S. Patterson. 22 Marion Edwards vs. Samuel Mclntyre et a!.; Woods tfc McKay; P. T. VaDZiK 23 1. Morris & Co. vs. Martha Martin ; Frank Hollman; S. H. Lewis. 24 Maroni Skeen vs. I. S. Waterman; Water-man; S. il, Lewis; Rosborough fc Merritt. 25 Edward Ellsworth v8. Geo. Q. Cannon, etc., et al.; E. D. Hoge; Sbeeks tfc Rawlins and F. S. Richards. Rich-ards. 26 Salt Lake City va. Robert McW'hooncy; J. L Rawiins; Woods tfc McKay. 27. Louis Marier va. Daniel H. Wells; J. R, McBriU; Woods tfc McKay. 2S Wm. H. Peterson va. William Brown; P. J. Barratt and C. P.Huey; E. D. Hoge and N. 'lanner. ileury Kucly va. MngUelme Moeaser; J. D. Lomax; Slioeks tfc Rawlins. 30 Edward Covington vs, Francis D. Clift; Woods t!c MeKav; Marshall &. Royle. 31 Win. Cooper va. Jas. Duncan et al.; R. N. Baskin; F. HcBman. 32 Wm. Cooper va. Jas. Duncan etal.; R. N. Baskin; F. Hodman. 33 Nicholas Groesbeck vs. Ump-sted Ump-sted Reucher; E. D. Hoge; Williams tfc Younp. 34 Mary L. Culler et al, vs. Utah Central R R. Co,; Marshall A Royle; Williams tfc Young. 35 Hannah Lapish ve. B. C. and C. F. R. U. Co.; Bennett tfc Harkness and C. P. Huey; J- G. Sutherland. 36 Anthony C. Ivins et al. vs. N. C. Boatman et nil.; Sutherland & McBride; Bennett k Harkness. 37 Salt Lke City vs. R. G. Jones et al.; J. L. Rawlins; R. N. Baskin. 3S Jamea Tucker vs. Wm. Gill Mills et al.; Tiiford tfc Hagan; Woods & McKay. yj Wills, Fargo fc Co. vs. Wm. G. Williams et al.; Marshal & Royle; Ecnnetttfc Harkness and J. R. McBride. Mc-Bride. 40- Wells, Fargo & Co. vs. II. C. Shurtlifl et al.; Marshal tfc Royle; J. R. McBride and Bennett tfc Harkness. 41 Julia A. Adams et al. vs. Chas. H. Wilcniu; R. N. Baskin; Sbeeks tfc Rawlius. 4J J. L. Newlon et al. vs. Wm. 1 Brown; J. N. Kimball; W. W. Woods. 43 Selah Chamberlain et al. va. Cnns. H, Raymond; Tillord Lt Hagan; V. C. Hull and Bennett &. Harkness. 45 Neils Anderson vs. W. ind J. V. R. R. Co.; Tiifcrd & ling; J. G. Sutherland. 46 0. Durant et ah va. Kearaarge S. M. Co.; Bennett & Harkness; Til-ford Til-ford & Hagan. 47 Carl Suisted v0. W. C. Rydalcb; Tavlor & Tripp; Williams tfc Young. 4S Chicago T. & M. Co. vs. John W. Kerr; Tiiford &. Hngan; Bennett & Hartnesp. 4'. . Durant et al. vp. Keariare 3. M. Co.; BenDett Jc Harkness; lil-lord lil-lord ifc Hgn. 50 Ant'rpw Adams vs. C. R. Br-ralt; Br-ralt; Bennett & Harkness; Soieki tfc Kiwiirs. 51 Paul Ileus vp. M. ShauubnPMy; V. J. Barratt and C. P. Hufy; E. D. Hoee and N. Tanner. 62 Thoe. Slater vs. Henry Hanker; Han-ker; J. B. Dillty aod T Burmeeter; S. J. Jnna-ron. 53 NaihAn Tnr.r-r vs. Richard Howe; E. l. H.-ge; Taylor Jt Tripp. ."i-1 Djvis, Hcffp k Co. vs. I. S. W meruit.: Mushail & R.yle; K l I 7, ut'n & .M-.rr,ll. j S'y Htnry mrs t. ?eUli C:iam- ; h; ra-,n et a: ; W. C Hail and 11 n- nit; & Hbrtr-ff-; T itrd k Hgaii. j ,"f'. Hrnrv 5:rv.r--.,s v. Sc!ah Cham bt rl.ii n tt a!.; W. C. Hail r.d Ben- u.;t & Harkne?-; T..!o:d j: Hgan. 57-(.,:ivcr D.;rit,t et al. r. 8-Uh Cn.in-.ii'"T'a;u e( h. ; iJ-ui.i-it A HarK- n-. ; i.d A II a. ;j-Ih;i:,i K. F t.v.n (i-r.rP Winii? -; W vv. W..- .!s C. H. M.'7fcf.l. 5,' Slt L-ite (';'. v Frederick Jonrs; J. L Rwhn?; H. Pratt. |