Show Carbis Thit TOO LAP TO c t the a t 1 b over the contestant va wa finally ay by the court courtIs Is gir Ont the und iUd h hai t the t was we rot tile Iby law the rule mid do n the conte t ease case ol o flury 1 g County ion r i Home a tea n written bY arni eoW In by Justice a ch DI Wet dee dge at in th the cae in place Of bf Chief arf iMin ra hp ws then 11 WT uc W tUft th district court on Thc IDec 2 last a d at the th hearing on demurrer before belore Hall Ball the moved i IA the coutee on n the had failed to the non within th forty days after the return day he law aw and that th K f ore Uw hod t and he con content n tent tet The flu court below hz upon the Th Iy point p tL supreme court cop v as th day ip V The ibe tat ile The Phe appellant that it V the rIV g board declared th of i tion a between the fo to candidates and the that th day was t the h date fore for the canvassing to te cum com mence menee which aa the first after a aJ or J ov If 11 of tk n vaa it declared de until V nine days daYH V VIn V In passIng passing upon this stated that mo no in ISA the te board of if canvassers to t make mke to tien tn do under any in s i S and that the ip 1 th t return thy day the legisla legislature legislature ture ac in of the law as exacted ye s Wn bf that th the contest as not commenced 9 tiit ifon oi ty ty daj w r ftfe th return preme d the thet ruling of Judge Unlit In the contest Ith costs the th contestant |