Show WHY COUNSEL FOR SAMPSON i DIN TO A WASHINGTON DJ PATH H it is generally understood J 1 1 II he st U iI that Admiral ial sampson ampson is s to t be represented by counsel 1 d th i IP of ot Inquiry i will examine the various barges haege that n m j against Ac inal L ley Of if course this is a a matter malter that hat thatto thatto 1 to t I i by t Ut if court of for tor they are the sole judges heth ir i not the ge of counsel shall haU he e r accorded anyone ne i ulta ouIs m to know on Oft what ground Admiral Sampson will willI 11 I t t by is l S SS S Iste I oat hal Admiral Sampson Is Ii I one of It the witnesses that the be court C urt Ji ti But BUI O ic C his conn tion with ith the investigation ends or one would bt i lId i tid 1 If so h 11 he has no need Deed ef f counsel Why then does doe he i 1 lie e rf n ed trl by ns I There are art no charge char against him Mm J tm The TheS S Is s not ask a aski o 1 i c called caIle for the purpose t airing tile the Samp r r it Y co r rs The public has heard beard enough of ot that already The 1 JOSt ise S T T his lis is tribunal i is t tt to gi give gie e Admiral A miral Schley an opportunity of dis illS that if true would reflect on his character as an anthe anthe the fert States na nathen nay navy S y then c rte desire dil ne to be represented Dented by counsel l Is he act acta ad a d di re HO to n aid a fellow low officer in establishing his bis integrity and UK 1 Ir c rem n repetition If so 80 the desire s 5 a laudable one but dral a hl s J ean an safely t h entrusted to his own counsel couMe of having baYing he the charges harg s male by Maclay J ram ain J fH m O i r If so the ri tie is Js not quite qute so 80 commenda V 1 ira has haa any to make against Admiral Schley i td i b is isider d by b the court that he ht prefer men Ien But in default I r ting ung ng y there re see i ti tt be no go BOd i reason why he have i te t e I |