Show J IJAN WATER ATE CASE ASE CASEI I SUPREME Ur EME GOURT COU AT ATty AppealS from of ty tJ Judge 7 OF W N Nr NIJU r IJU WILL f j BD I i deCision OR oa o 1 mod modi I to a S tere teres i a tM s Salt It ItI I pur co S 1 aty to cond ight t ot way I canal made I o tile the the ae osa of a 1 for tor I writ of rari rt to command rt g ot of tile the court to certify t case hi h hue I his granted the theft thelt Justice ue lt It and aDd made It R on Sept SP SPIke t tae Ike the ae lower lor court T comma t to tC ar owr C 8 DO no further proceedings in the pi pit pr for the writ It ta Ia 1 the lb d m b be tM tb elF t teel tt to d 4 If y the I eel er of WU way WUn waya condemn S a right richt the wilt to with wilh the city aaI Ie t n a wed to d so tc permit t t to break e the theal power of f bank for tor th al there un of f the ther t to i the he canal the city e r flow after it comet comes tro tM power t he mI mint the to we u the eIO wa war wain It 11 fur furr in UPP I the r err that the W I which MoTe MolIe acted a ed U le P ge n 0 made to app y to the 5 ft It t to o yield a Jf If way over property to a n nB f the the subject to ri B damnation NIt uit upon the glY an aD indemnifying bono |