Show last saturday Sat the judges 0 of the supreme Sup court of the territory gave hoir decisions in the suit against the personal property of tile the church of jesus christ of latter day saints chief Justice Zane analyzed carefully the arguments 0 presented by tho the prosecution and the defense A number of points in law were quoted sho showing that the courts had no right light to designate 0 personal property gathered for charitable purposes to be used for purposes entirely different from what nhat the giver intended it it was shown that this property had bad been used for no definite def luite purpose by the first presidency of the church when they had charge of it but that they used it wherever in in their judgement jud gement it would do the most good when men property is gathered from the people to be used for a diversity of purposes some of which in thi course of time should become unlawful it does not prevent the remaining 0 property being confined cond iud to anyone any one or more than one of those purposes which are legal counsel for the defense asked that this personal property be confined to assisting the poor and the repairing of houses of worship while the prosecution wanted the property to lie be used for the benefit of the common school but as that was not intended by the donors it it could not be accepted the head of court seemed in fa vor of vesting the property in the birol fir tt denev of tile the cla clarrell frell t i 1 I II 11 i a i i tiu durnes i jh ish ed them to direct its use bill tile the associate justices were in favor of having a trustee appointed appin ted to charge of it leonard G hardy waa appointed trustee prosecution however will appeal to the supreme court of the united states |