Show A GREAT ARGUMENT 31r Richards Speech in Favor of XHsen and Constitutional Libert WASIHNTON April 2iSpcciat to TIE HlmLDIn the supreme court today in the case of Nelsen SolicitorGen oral Jenks concluded his argument contending that to constitute unlaw contending consttute ful cohabitation and adultery one continuous inuous offense the essential elerfents of the one must be embraced by the others that a cohabitation might exist without adultery and vice versa they were neces arily distinct offenses Richards followed closing the case He insisted that sexual intercourse was involved olved in unlawful cohabitation I was essential part of the same transaction and while cohabitation might exist without martl intercourse such intercourse became be-came a material part of cohabitation con tltutlng it one and the same offense He contended that if an indictment be had for any part of a continuous offense a second indictment for any other part or the whole I of said offense was barre and vice versa He made an exhaustive reyiSw of ersa1 America and English authorities on the I question of being put twice in jeopardy for I the same offense demonstrating that if the doctrine contended for were not estab lshe constitutional security could not |