Show 0 P ARNOLD ON TRIAL I The Testimony of the Prosecution Prose-cution All InV A In-V RY INTERESTING CASE t That Visit to Ogden A Question as i to tboKlglxts Ofa Husband and iather Yesterday morning the case of 0 P Arnold was reached In the Third Dis trit Court but went over till theafter noon Mr Dickson stating that oneof his witnessfs had not yet arrived The case attracts considerable attention owing to the fact that Mr Arnold had before been indicted for living with the same two ladies named in the present indictment having plead guilty having promised to obey the law as it was at that stage construed by the court and having escaped imprisonment on that promise His reindictments caused no little surprise though it will be remembered remem-bered that the general public expression expres-sion at the time was that had Mr Ar nolds name not appeared so prominently prom-inently in connection with that of Geo Q Cannon at the time of his famous arrest I ar-rest he would never have been disturbed i I by the Prosecutor The case came up again at 230 in the afternoon by Judge Zune askiiig Are you ready to take up the case agaiustO P Arnold 1 MB DrcE oxYes if the witnesses are present Tile clerk called the names of the wit nesses all of whom answered when the loiluwmt jurors were called to the box Dusacldorf SB Underbill JoiMjli Footer George Shill J M Harvey Win Afellit Louis JiuuiDorger JH W iihon H r Murtm James Winchester W II Roy 8 CAll PancllCe I C-All were passed for cause by the defense de-fense save James Harvey who was let out for having an unqualified opinion Louis Bauiberger had had a conversation conversa-tion with one of the witnesses but was retained by Mr Rawhns Louis Bamberjrer was sharply questioned ques-tioned by Mr Dickson but was allowed to remain in the box Mr Pancake had a conversation with Mr Watrous about it Watrous was his soninIaw he did not think the conversation had taken place since he had been drawn on the venire Mr Wilson had never talked about the case he had been connected vith the Tribune Democrat and fltron id but was now acting us agent MK D cKaON with a MUilejI believe I will excise Mr Pancake hit PtAWLi > s We will excuse Mr Shili MK DICKSON We wilt excuse Mr Bainourger tur caue and Mr 1by Mu ItAWUSS Wo will excuse Mr ftoser Charles Shield George Morrison I L Osborn Edward Berry Bowman Cannon Can-non and E M Byuon were called to the vacant seats in the dice box Bynon was excused oy the defense for having both formed and expressed an opinion Cannon stepped down and put for having hav-ing an opinion TIns still left a vacancy of two and Thomas Davis and Frank McLaughlin were called Mr Davis had read the Tribune but had never heard the case which was not at all improbable he could not tell what his business was he had been a cleric in the Continental Hotel but had done nothing since he left there Mr Davis twas excused peremptorily per-emptorily by the defense and as lie passfed down he congratulated himself that ho hadgot out sof thatscrapej George Mullett was called to the one vacant chair and he was passed by bath aides and sworn THE JUPjY ilTiuKeWorf cfiarlosShielfis r 1 SutltrhiH f I GOorsclSIoriiDsta i Vl1ilicCtne IT O b rQ J m sba Edward Herr K P ilmia yank Icr 1Wh1in James Wiuetfester Corge Mulrfkt < f The indictment was then read by the Clerk which charged ttiat defendant had since April 13th 1885 unlawfully cohabited with rdXire t apron oman as his wives The indictiheutcontains three counts Me DICKSOX aSKed that all witnesses 4n the case for both sides be excluded from the court room if the defense would be kind enough roindicate who their witnesses were MCl R < WLIKS We may not noVhave any Ve cant tell until you get through j vjtl t 4 THE JUDGE Lett them all be excused MB DICKSON then called Orson Ar noIdJr JHte saiU Aina sdn of be defendant my mother lives in the Thirteenth Ward have not lived at home during the period named in the indictmei I visit mother about oncea week haV5 seen father at mothers house during meal times father has been away from home some of the times time-s nce May lS85rhe wasj awav from home two or three mouths I think know Fannie Linnell Arnold she lived Ion I-on First West Street this city snfe na I lived there for six or seven years have been at her houdo several times during i the time since the month of May 1 > OT have seen her there everytiirre tI went theret she has four chitilren the eldes is about yeas old I should judge the other threehe onng tlscabOln1 3 years old it is a boy I think 1 Rave neverheard it c ledr DV ri rne iaVe seen my father at Faunjes iipiue suxcethelst of May 18S5 two or three tim we have passed there several times in a buggy when he would call in and I would wait for him until he came out I never left him there nor called for him E donot think would have forgotten itif I had dOne soeither bt ioreorsince May ISJtit s Some time since 1 saw father at Fannies alter some hesitation > ibout a month ago the last time I saw hik there was when I left him in a buggy I waited orhim to come out as we went there together fib was bsent about five minutes whrn he returned I have been there with him three or four times during the past year twice in the past two mo ths11 am merely messing at it now i 1 dont remember having seen him there ince the first Jtnuary and the llth of May this year 1 MB DICKSOX WeJI Ill see if I cant refresh your memory Reaching ior hisgrand jury nojes J i MB SHKEKS We ohject to any re frehing aav using of such notes which are the most unreliable df anvthing th t couldjxs offered MB DIOKSON The gentlernnn has no r ght to quts ion thee note or say that the clerk of the Grand Jury had madert false entry Mr Dick on was allowed to read from his notes when heasked Did you not say in the Grand Jury room in reference to your bbxrj that you bad seen him at the Souse within the first two or three months or th a vear WITNESS I dont ihink I made any ucb a statement To MB RWLINS Whpnpver father called on Fannie he did nt tell me what he went forhe never said ° ny thing to me I suppose he went thereto there-to see the children ihere has been but little or nj association betwean the two families PAMfiE D AKSOLD Was called Mr Didks n braced himself for an effort The lady flab I was married to the defendanUourteen tars ago defendant defend-ant has b en at my house to see tee cnildrxii quitecften generally as often as once a weeklie I has been away during dur-ing the present atI dfl not reoiem bar the exact date could not tell anything any-thing about it qe did not tell me where he was going he has eaten there several times but not this year I went to Ogden with him in May 1885 I left nere in company with him and came back with him we stopped at a hotel we had dinner aud supper there I had m meals sent to my room he did not eat 1 with me1 do not know where he slept he came into the room with the waiter when the meals were brought up he may have been there in the morning before WQ went to the tram he did not ijtaV a year agothe last summer we were out driving it was when uiy baby was sick I could not say how many timesthis was in the summer of 1835 I have nofc been out with him since that time have never been at the Theatre with him since the 1st of May 1885 he took me home from there once or twice in company wit i my sister he was at my house during the latter part of Jannaiy Ithiuk when there was sickness sick-ness 1fo MB R VWLINS I remember when Mr Arnold pleaded guilty to the crime of unlawful cohabitation at that time it was undent od that we were nj to hold the relations of husoand and wife any iiiorf sincB that nose he has been there but oce at nightwhen my biiby was ill my ianuly is dependent upon Mr Arnold for u living he baa provided us with a home whenever he called it was in the daytime it was during the illness of the baby that we went oat riding with iti it was by the advice of a physician that we took the baby out he took meals there at my invitation to meet and talk with the children the time he staid all night was when the baby was sick he sat up with it sometimes wheh he called he never entered the house his visits were on I business and to look after the children there has never been any association between the two families i could not say what the exact date of the visit to Og den was he asked me if I would like to go to Ogden and I told nim yer he I was onfy in my room on the occasions mentioned in my answers to Mr Die son have never lived with the deftnd ant ab his wife since the lit ot May last year To MH DiCK > OlMr Arnold may have aVcomptfmed me to the depot WileD we went to Ogden and drove me Hi me whf we returned Excused Miss AIicI ABNOLD Am the daughter of the defendant have lived at my mothers during the past two years father has been home every night sav one when ever he was in the city and that was when he stopped at the other house on tae occasion of the childs sickness ELIzA TABDitEB I live in the Fourteenth Four-teenth Ward know Fannie Arnold my residence is three blocks away from her pJl1ce previous to two months neo I lived close to her housenext door I know defendant have been acquainted with him two years I saw him at Fannie Arnolds frequently during last summercould not say how ofren he was there some times in the afternoon and other times fn the morning have beemin tho house since tbe 1st of May I 1885 and have seen defendant there have never seen the defendant there at night usually went in the back door aiid came out thp same way the house fronts oh the street hive seen Mr Arnold thre during the present year I To MR RAWtixs The route taken by Mr Arnold in going and coming WAS the path utually used bv visitors to the hduse Ms ARNOLd was recalled at the request re-quest of Mr Dickson who said hem he-m rey desired to ask her one question She said > t L was Jat home on the occasion oc-casion when I invited def ndanttq come and take meats with the children we all ate together ME DICKSON excused the lady and then leaned over and indulged in n whisper and a broad smiTe at Mr Rawlms Mr Sheeks and the prosecutor prose-cutor bad a little conversation during which the Grand Jury notes were referred re-ferred to and V JOKX TYLEtt clerk of the Broom Hotel was called He came into court with the r ° gisjer under his armle said 1 am clerk at the Broom Hotel was there during the monthof May lR 5 I know tfie def nlanfrfhe canie4bere in May 183j jncom lpal11v1 with a lady he registered as HQ P Arnold and U Gr Arnold I say the ady withhir and asked him to rem > tpr be did so and signed Mr Arnold He said he wan ted wo t rponis The register was shown to thp jurjr x V WTTHESS The tooms occupied bv Mr Arnold and the lady adjoined and therejv s a dopi between To MR RAsvirrs The > oonisW5re jIf rjp iiiriit1ife lefend 1 t a3keoV for two rooms he did not select the rooms I dare them to tfifn THOMAS P 1 SMITH the deputy mar hal iWo pwofnfXrfo i defendant know where Fanny Arnold lives have seen the Gfendant coming DutJoHth puse since the istof January lS that vasbetween lpjl9 pclQck ijitbe TIlormng the boy was waiting In a buffEy outside he hadhis bat ndt overcoat over-coat on that was on the 29th day of January one amlT1ff half hoursafter sunrise Miss ARNOLD caUedFather always leaves oar housein the morning before oclock ME > DICKEOK jsvjdehtlv disappointed Thatrsall Call E A Franks B A FRANKS I saw defendant go in and out of Fannie Arnolds utu v i v j ± A ut LiL Jl njijA house several sev-eral timesjri Januarv JaH I saw him go into the house between 7 ai d S oclock in the evening and came oat bs tWl en 10 and 11 He then went up to the Continental This was on the 15th of January I saw him agAin on the evening eve-ning of the ITtn he came out about H oclpck went up town and returned To MB RiWLiss The defendant was at the Continental about 10 on the night of the 15th I followed him ncht up do not know where he went after DP left the hotel on the night of the 17th he went in to the house abuut 9 he came out about 11 went up to the Cunti ntntal followed him back to the house and I saw him enter it I then passed on to First North do not know what became of him after that The evidence for the proseculion being all in a continuation was taken until this morning |