Show SELECTING JURORS m EXPEDITION with wih which h THE I the jury jur r in iii the trial of the an anarchist anarchist anarchist Czolgosz was chosen is isa a romar blo and pleasing exception to the tho ruja in ut American murder trials Yet there thure was no undue haste shown All AU men who had ba formed opinions that could not be changed by b boid evidence oid wore vore excused and it is probable probable probable able that as fair and impartial a Lody of men wore got together ps as is had the impaneling been b p allowed to drag along for weeks as often happens in inthe inthe inthe the case caso of a 8 prominent criminal The TIle method of examining jurors in inmost inmost inmost most of tho tim states has become so ex ox exacting I acting loaves s room for so much quibbling i bling that the system stem has hns become little better botter than n a farce It has como come comoto comoto cometo to such a n pass that in order to be bc eli clio eligible gible for a n juror a matt man must m st be either an s creature or one ono who never noor reads tho the daily papers and andis andis andis is out of touch tOU 11 wirL villi the tho most import important ant affairs affair of tho the day d F FIt It is n a common saying about crimi criminal criminal nal courts that toot there is never noor c a case CaBe so that it is safe to predict what a jury will ill do io Thoro Thero can be belittle belittle belittle little wonder at this uncertainty when the ideal juror of the tho average crimi 1 lawyer is a freak who rho read the tho papers or an opinion to offer on ho lie has road read To the layman l it seems as though the tle ends of justice would bo ho far bet bot better better ter served and innocent prisoners put in ill let les 1 1 jeopardy if quibbling objections objections were tete ruled out so 50 that intelli intelligent goat gent men who believed they could upon the tho case caso fairly might bo be eligible as furors jurors in a murder trial even cv ii if they did rend read the papers and nd form fonn opinions |