Show CHICAGO EXPERT IS CALLED TO TESTIFY IN UTAH RATE CASE Outlines Plans of Electric Company to Erect Proposed Proposed Pro Pro- posed Plant to Declaring he lie had been engaged b by bythe bythe the Utah Po Power cr Light company compan to prepare preparo an nn estimate of or an assumed electrical generating plant William S S. S Monroe a t member of ot the firm of ot Sergeant Ser Ser- geant Jund Lundy of Chica Chicago o was the first witness on the stand yesterday In the hearing he before ore the public utilities utilities utilities ties commission o on on tho the application of the tho company compan for an Increase in rates for pow power r. r After mal making ln the statement as ns to his employment h by the power company compan he said In answer to a question that he was In Instructed as to the location loc of tho the I plant and nd that he proceeded to make i an estimate on a plant of oC kilowatts kilowatts kilo kiln watts Installed capacity with an effective ef- ef ef effective e output of or kilowatts This I cr-I plant he said was to be located on Ithe i r the tha northeast shore of or Utah lake Ho ITe HoI based ased his estimate on the assumption I that the thc power would have havo to be transmitted trans trans- I milled to the thc terminal substation overa over overa a a kilowatt line The Tho report of oC his estimates had been formally Introduced Introduce In evidence It showed a cost of OCO for tor generating generating gener gener- station lIon Including land and track connections cn engineering lUll and the usual I o overhead expenses nn and Interest l i charges To this was added 52 for substations and transmission lines making a total of The report shows hos that to operate such a plant there would b be required a t payroll outlay per annum of J i bl based baaed ed on kilowatt kilo maximum maximum lend lead and 7 73 jj per cent annual load fac- fac tlc tlc-I tor The cost coo of po power er it was shown I would be from such a plant operating operating i at kilo kilowatt at ma maximum ln lIm 75 ii per percent percent cent load l factor l mills per kilo kilo- kilo kilo-I writ 60 J per r cent load factor I mills per Ter kilowatt and SO 30 per cent nt load i factor O mills per pcr kilowatt It was stipulated at the tIle c of or Mr Ir I Monroes Monroe's testimony that his evidence c so 80 far as it was relevant ml might hl be he c considered con considered con con- as part of the e evidence e n In Inca Incase incase ca case e No o 30 which has to do with the present ent alle alleged discriminating rates of oC I Ithe the power company I Mr tr Monroe concluded his testimony at I p p. m m. when Louis 1 plant engineer er for cor the tho Electric Bond Share Shuc I company was as called to the stand st He i was a asked kell a number of technical I questions I It t |