Show I SUPREME COURTS COURT'S DOCKET NUMBERS THIRTY 1 THIRTY FIVE IVE CASES Thirty Thirty five cases are ire on tho the docket o of the supreme court ro for the May term which convenes May tay 10 The cases and the tho date data set for their hearing hearing hearing hear hear- ing ing- ingaro aro are as follows Baker vs Goodman Good- Good man man May ta 10 Bankers Bankers' Trust company com corn pany p vs s Riter May 21 Barker Barkers vs s Utah-Idaho Utah C Central railroad Ma May 17 Berger vs Salt Lake May 18 Ber Berg Berg- I strom vs s Mellon Melten Mn May 24 21 Coke Cokl vs May 24 Consolidated Wagon Machine company compan vs VB Wright May 11 ii Cummings vs va Hines May 19 19 Fowers Fowers Fow- Fow ers vs Lawson May 19 Herald vs Smith May Ma 11 Huntsman vs VB Huntsman Hunts Hunts- man map May tay 25 23 Irrigation company compan companS vs S HoBo Hollo May 20 Jones one In relation to lo estate May 12 Manning vs I Day May ta 25 23 Matson vs Matson May MayIS IS 18 Metcalf f vs Mullen Mellen May 24 Murray urray elt city vs Utah LI Light ht Traction com com- pany May 14 1 Musser MusserS vs S Co banker May fay 13 Rose Rollo vs Girn Garn May 18 vs Utah count county county coun coun- ty t May 13 State vs Brown Br wn May 10 State vs Martinez May 11 State SUtta vs May 10 State vs H Roberts Robert May fa 10 vs Adams May 13 Stevenson Sto vs s Stevenson Ste May 14 14 Thackeray vs vs Knight May 21 Ukon Water com company pan va vs 5 Rooker May Tny tn 17 Utah Copper company vs s Industrial commission May 24 West V Cache Sugar company Yr vc Thomas May tat 1 12 West ct Sugar SUlar company any anyS vs S ZIons ZIon's Savings Say Sav ings ls bank May y 12 Western Securities company compan vr VS Silver Kinc Int Mining campan corn com pan pany May 25 Wo GIn V Up Gln in relation to Ia estate May ta 17 Ii Woolley vs Loose May 1 a 1 14 11 Young vs s 's Corl s sheriff May a 1 10 S |