Show EXHIBITS FILL COURT AT MINE SUIT ARGUMENT ARGUE Ore Dodies cs Valued a at T Ten c Millions Involved in inDig Dig Big g Case Surrounded b by moro than a carload carload carload car car- load or of exhibits models maps raps specimens charts and documents tho two vo cults of tho final ar arguments In I Ithe the Utah Consolidated Mining Mining- company and tho Utah Apex Mining company n Involving to oro bodies In Bingham Bing- Bing ln b bo worth north ham which arc estimated to worn begun be- be from to Judge Judg-c Tilman D. D gun Kun yesterday before Johnson in tho United Slates States court representing tho the Utah Con Con- John Gray with tho entire day occupied I tho his arguments It Is IN expected that and be bo continued today arguments will finished Saturday the evidence was concluded SInco all nn December the exhibits ho have vo last Jut been arranged In tho courtroom for the tho which of ot tho the arguments presentation Tho The usual array of will Ul tho the case but the tide engl- engl was Wl present attorneys International of ot I nee s and geologists note wore veto not there Attorney Gra Gray In opening his arguments U- U open should ments declared that tho court treat the case cane the same samo as ns though It one brou brought ht Into a 1 lawyers lawyer's of or- or lice Ice He referred to tho the Richmond Richmond- doctored was teas Eureka c case ule which he the first In which tho the limestone was held to bo be the tho lode lod Later he re referred referred re- re to tho the old Jordan or 01 Lawson Lalon weOn case In which he said that tho the t limestone lime that lode and held to bo be the stone t no was as tho the Jordan corresponded with the Highland Boy limestone or lode He Ile also referred to the Red River c case ass which former fonner Judge John A. A Marshall 1 decided while ho was In tho the United States court bench D Declare tt jie Iod Inde lie He 11 also o touched upon Attorney Curtis Curtis Curtis Cur Cur- H H. Lindley's book on mining law from the tho which brought a 1 response attorney that he could not defend his statement and that ho did not trial know that the th lawyers were on Lindley Al also o objected to the fordan for dan case being used as a n precedent He lie argued that In the properties In there were ere two great lIme lIme- Itono stratas that had produced 75 and the tho answer to th entire was that the miners followed rhese In search for oro ore throughout the tho result of oC canyons of ot Bingham As a this ho said sahl the ore bodies were found Cound The Tho bl big deposits he declared were round found In tho the lime beds and only onh an infinitesimal part of the ore was found in the quartzite Tho The limestone stone ho Asserted was tho the lode lodo as defined denned b by he law Maps Wrong roll He no S SIn In tho the arguments Attorney r Gray re- re erred extensively to tho testimony of Jr r. r Waldemar Lindgren ren and Albert lurch geologists for the tho Utah Apex I nd Ind sought to show th the variance In the flence given ghen H He He- also disputed tho the of or maps and mod models cIs pre pre- I declaring that workings In I I aln places were Cf omitted from the naps and ore was not placed In proper laces on the models Attorneys John A A. A Marshall Curtis T. T LI dlo and and William E. E Colby Colb rep- rep th the t Utah tall Apex 10 probably r will wm all of toda today in their arguments chile It is expected that either Attorney ney ley Gra Gray or Attorney r C. C Ellis Bills the tho Utah Consolidated will nish tomorrow |