Show AR CONTENT R R IR PAST YEAR ELOW AVERAGE of 1919 terse erse es e's i e Conditions for Low Lo ow Quality of Beets dUclion of b beet ct sugar in lu the Unit Unit- Ates tes for the current season 1919 i short tons which Is be- be I hi he forecast of or the thc crop mado made carthe earn ear ear- Jin n the the season sal said M. M M. M Justin T lot t tho the department of or agriculture tab Itah fah and Nevada Ne yesterday two t per cent of th the planted plante or or acres was abandoned arlous adverse con conditions in- in I tho quality of tho the beets he j I sued so that the sugar sug-Or content reported as tho poorest in years CH but the total n aunt 3 of I I indicated by tho the lu was r ns s greater reater than tho crop of re 1918 rc were eighteen factories in inland Und land the production of sugar Bug was 9 short tons of or 2000 pounds The go ge B extraction was 1119 per cent lie fe average e sugar content 1419 per which was a fraction higher than he the United States at lar large e. e Tho The st t was vas acres and the tho titles lUes worked was short iW H The average crag price at tho the farm cots a n. ton was 10 and the acre acre- was 40 o figures for acreage c and differ somewhat from tho the state cs for tor the reason that b beets are aro ed cd out of oC the state to be bo made malic sugar The total production of oC beets In the state was F The general g average yield anfor an antor for ifor the United States was as tons per aero acre and for tor Canada Canalla ins s 8 per acre hum syrup made malle In Utah In 1919 ed d 2000 gallons with a It total farm tarm ilof lor This was produced 0 o 0 acres farm values of important lets In Utah to November 15 lb 1919 od ed that beef cattle were selling seJling 60 a n hundred pounds n. n as compared fa a a. national average of veal Co 11 1190 90 as ns compared with aver aver- f. f 1265 sh sheep I 7 jO as compare compared average of 35 lambs lomb 1080 an as axed with average of oC 1145 tur- tur cents a n pound as compared e of oC SHi lambs lamb 1080 10 0 O asla as la fa a pound as compared with avert aver aver- j f t 51 bl cents much cows 77 O a with average a of 3 r a head compared with av- av lot lc 1144 turnips 10 1 O a n bush- bush with average of oC cents 5 5 a n bushel bushel compared with av- av ot of 44 t timothy 2480 2430 a a. ton with an nn average of oC t- t 2290 2 IO r l' 2 as compared with an nn av- av of OC 2161 alfalfa 2170 as ns com com- with average of ot 2163 branas brantas bran tas as as compared with average of |