Show WOLFE OPINES CATTLE LICENSE LAW IS VOID V 0 I D DUtah Utah Attorney General Cite Cites I U. U S. S Constitution in ill I Opinions Opinion's ns n's Defense I i Licensing Icen of c. c c cattle t lc l horses sheer sheep and in d I Butis goals brought Into utan Utah for grazing purposes which Is la provided pro In a law palt passed ed by the thirteenth J Is I lir pronounced unconstitutional In n a len nth th opinion b by Assistant Attorney General James H H. H Wolfe 0 IC e. e The opinion IB la given In r reply ply to a request reque t front from the state statu live UVo C cem- cem m ss on It was waa shown to tile the coin coin- miss mission on that the Imposition of th uv tax x provided b by tho the net ot of r 1 l a ho td on cat cattle tic and horses and add 20 C cents n a head on sheep and goats honts wax broil The Thc states of Arizona And N Nevada were from the ht It ho the act acL Tho live lIvo stock k commission In A view tes lew that no provision pro n was node nado t fur for r the collection of or the tho tax requested tho the opinion of ot th the tho legal department of the thc state slate In to that tho tax way Was In tt bu bo paid to the board J Assistant Attorney General Wolfe sums Rums up the tho cause causo for tor this opinion In three points viz i First Because It ll places pinceR n a burden hurden on interstate commerce o sUch auch an as J Would not be permitted s save ve in certain ct 1 tinder ift tP the exercise of ot v police powers and that thal this is a no tax and not t n police pollee regulation Second Second-It nd It violates the tho United l States 8 constitUtion In ln that It u denies to pcr persons persona ns u within n the Jurisdiction of or thu tho State state equal protection of ot the law Jaw Third Third Third-It It violates the tho rU which provides that the he citizens of ot each state should tJ bo be entitled entitled to e and Int of oC tho chit of tho several seVera |