Show r ERS READ t. t if t f TRIAL OF 1 SUI T Said to lo Have ReI RePlant Re- Re 0 seer r eer Plant in Cani Can- Can I P ant Sit Sugar I i 1 Not Ot Vl Tort orth 11 l Io Movin Moving ing a t r mace vA vas H. H Judge William l u before Judicial district of or i lilt Third bY the n WC West est Cacho reco er alleged cd so soby sode so- so pan r. r to J J J- A A. A H Hendrickson ItS l de by br in inez the transfer of or from the ez t p to 0 f the Plaintiff t a gar r which v ere ero S. S introduced t a rue b by W W. T. T Canty Can- Can written ty to he be w Engineering nr h contract with a the with had sn hO dismantle th the Knight c. c to and erect Ion nond Canada 11 a S to be chosen clos n In la Utah orIta or ore Ita to I Cannon who ho was In w e fro the plant wrote nn loOking nn It tt over O would not P pay Py y to at- at cT r 7 v e and re erect ln tha ina ant ore o of tho ea 9 tho capacity it If thon tho 11 soo tons with n sill etch by br tho the rt lt equipment n rod ro- ro additional nr ove a ibe he rS ne necessary over overL rd d the L railed ed for or in tho sped sped- fir f amount to a D. large largo 5 sum Rum i is s rill be n nearly equal probably r old fX of or the S same mc Car Careal ca- ca un Plant HI r later dismantled b y It t real 39 and erected yau C anon company h. bb Utah or of the L Cannon Lynch er rQn testified to has has' ei I about bring brins- 4 led to to owned by the thet I e ar v plant In nam Raymond nd Canada I tt lapin t on In Idaho I aho or Utah St r r tilt fite Canada to to t sent to was as 1 toe the I TC tbt the p plant an and report on C parr and md erecting re-erecting It it ing remo oI t II IIi i fu of or Trenton Utah who W witness chair tho the greater the dS that he had testified r t da articles Incorporation of oC articles t e ro cache company compan beHe be- be Cache su Sugar ar cst e said he lie Wl was In a a. L Lt He lie aD and nd took look It for tOr granted tat t day erection e articled called for or the Dual I sr he be hur that h endrickson iFe said raid offered i OO to sell ell out hl his hi hiss ea and that s lr In la lathe It Ue sugar company 1 luJ this before be he signed the artl- artl c t I b counsel ou gel l t lime Ime was U taken laken up by c n lie defense protesting against en- en exhibits In tho the case were ere re the letters purport- purport to pure UM rc fc wen teen written b by i W W. r f T. T CanIS CanaM Can- Can t IS aM tt p P P. and some ome which in Logan Journal o of p. tie of or the company aph ap- ap la h January Januar 1017 Hili I e which was as final final- I slat stated ed that hat there was to bep be bo I and that every every- p j proms profits an Round i share sharo and share shaie shares s 50 t Benson Fenson admitted upon cross ex J Hoc that he was interested In r. or of a sugar plant in the tho loof 10 lo- Tot of Cache county count because ho was b. b je e landowner there He said the 07 hid greatly enhanced the theal al value uc lis land hoi D the tle noon session Mrs rs J. J A A- in who Rho was as present in tho tom the entire session of or court wort stopped topped Benson Denson who had Just It tit th witness stand and protesting tome oma of oC the things ho he had said saidI 51 I witness said Can you OU not stand standi r i friend who has stood b by you ou all aU life Ie trial will be resumed ll ll a. a n. n m Monda Monday |