Show f J BONDS STOP CLOCK L Secret Sette of Ml Inc Liberty Collateral CoUnt Collat eral erni Jo us Then Theil Solved t. t t. t 0 O. Jan 27 Frank Frank I GO an nn old od resident here t tucked away somewhere In his home worth of or Liberty bonds Ho could not remember where he ho had bad put them and searched franU frantically In hIB homo home to no avail n When his clock topped h hi found that the bonds bonde were hidden away inside tho L tl timepiece co a. a ff i. i i Case 4 Times In High Court Is s Remanded Trivial matters sometimes result In unusual things when tho tIm matters arc aro Involved In litigation atlon Thero There was an nn opinion handed down In tho supreme court ot of Utah yesterday that was waa out of or tho ol ordinary First because uso the Is Issue lii- lii sue suo Involved In waa tho trivial trl matter of ot fifteen gallons of of oC water ater per minute from a n spring secondly because tho case caso was WAN argued and submitted to the tho court on four tour different occasions something something some some- thing that has never no occurred before In tho history of ot tho court and thirdly third I ly because a previous pro opinion had been rendered according to yesterdays yesterday's opinion that was waa unsatisfactory and did not meet tho the approval of or nil the tho members of or tho ho court Tho The opinion was wan written b by Justice Prick Frick Tho The I C case at Issue IH hi Walter M. M n against Charl Charles M 1 J Green In which tho the plaintiff for tor Injunctive relief relict The trial court found tho the issues tI In favor of tho the defendant ant and jud Judgment ment was waa en entered entered entered en- en accordingly From Prom this the tho plaintiff plain tiff tift appealed The case caso was originally tried before Judge I Lewis owls in tho Third district court Tho supreme court says nays Hl'S that an nn opinion opinion ion Jon was wn rendered erell In tho the caso that was unsatisfactory and 1111 did not meet the tho approval al of nil all tho the members of or tho court during the tho same term May Mar 1917 and says Justice Frick Prick even the writer of ot the opinion was not fully tully satisfied satIsfied sat sat- IsCle with his own as the difficulties were Inherent in tho the record For the same ammo reason no other member of or the court was ablo able to write rito a n more satisfactory satis factory opinion than the one presented At the tho February term b by common consent th the tho case caso was again placed on the calendar and submitted for tor further argument an and it was hoped tho the hearIng hearing hearing hear hear- ing would develop new light and possibly possibly bl bly clear up deficiencies in the tho record Tho The attorneys failed to appear Then tho the case W was vas 8 o of Je necessity c on tho trio original briers but JUl no Ilu II new was obtained It was then again dul duly assigned but no opinion on the tho last assignment as asI assignment as- as I I was ever er written Duo Due to the death del of or Justice McCarty and the tho appearance on the bench of or a anew anew new now member to whom tho the caso had hall never been presented tho the caso case was wasa a again aln reset for argument during the present term Appellants Appellant's counsel appeared appeared ap ap- ap but respondent Green was not represented duo to th the death of ot his at attorney at- at torney which occurred since tho caso case was first sU submitted In In ju Justice to the tho respondent says Justice Prick Frick and because of ot the tho de deficiencies do- do In the record we are of or opinIon opinion opinion ion that the case should be reman remanded ell to tho the trial court for further proceedings proceedings proceed proceed- ings and that said court permit the parties litigant if iC they wo so desire to tc amend their BO 80 as ns to present every e Issue rt their Judgment to ho bo determined |