Show j JURY IN WOODARD CASE UNABLE TO AGREE E If After ter vainly trying to reach a verdict the Jury In lii the ca case e o of T Wood ard ni-il charged charled with wih second degree murde o oard for tor the killing o of lila his own lon son Wood Woodard ard decided at 11 1 M o'clock las la la night that they could not agree asree and awl f se 1 returned from rom the tho CI City and County build Ing lug to their hot hotel 1 The They will wi report Ithe I t the court this morning their Inability t to reach cache a decision The he issue as ns ought fought out by the ato attorneys toys ns arid and ar as at drawn r by the evidence t. WH ws' ws on one of or intent since the tho killing was ad ad- ad t- t Counsel for or the state tat Woodard killed his lila son while turner r in Influence o of an ungovernable temper an and that his Intent was shown h by tho f fact ta c that when he went Into the tho yard ard of ot hi home to take put part In the th fatal atal quarrel h It h. carried with witie him a n small caliber calber rifle CLAIM GLAIM LAIM ACCIDENTAL DEA I H. H The Tho contention o of the tho r defense deena was th that tho the killing wits accidental that accidental that had bath taken laken the lie rifle with wih him merel merely I tC to scare care tho lie boy and that Its 0 tha I wa was a accidental This argument was held to tc I dc despite plo the ice admitted fact act that three shots shot I were fired Ir Tho Tim killing occurred May 2 1917 11 at th the home o of the defendant In itt Wilmington avenUe a The father ather and son lon had been en I lit In I partnership In iii the t teaming earning and gra gravel hauling business and had quarreled ant over ove the ownership of or a team of ot horses which had b been en used In the business l. l The f fa- fa Ather A- A ther titer admitted owing th the bO boy 10 so ob tam tain satisfaction the boy hy attempted t to sell the team teem When hn he lie sought ought to take tak uke It I tram front the barn for or that purpose th the the I quarrel 1 ensued character was wal assailed b by District A Attorney lorney Wilson McCarty 0 attempted to show that he lie wan Waft o of a qu r lon and ad IIO o of ai an uncontrolled temper CHARACTER IS QUESTIONED The defense on the other hand at atI at- at I tempted to maintain that lard Woodard Ord was wai was was' wasa a respected citizen and nr a i member In hk leigh standing o of tIm the th Forest Forent 01 Dale Dahi of ot the thi Church u of Jesus Christ o of l latter atter Saints Bishop S. S fru Woodruff o of that tha tha url In th the church testified that thal In hIs I opinion hit the th d defendant was wan Immoral 11 l he statement wan a stricken from rom rein III tue Ih record and 1111 a nota notable hil Incident nur tin ens tl ar argument of tho the ca case wits Wil an ate Int of ot f th the district attorney h by foi fol the defense e wh n Mr Ir McCarty lc referred to o 0 Mrs Ir May Iny Taylor aylor housekeeper r for lor or thi Iff defendant Iu h he hI would penult tin U. U Jury to lo draw ti-nw l Its 0 own conclusions with regard In to the rel relations ane ht between W fl m mr r wih and th the defendant Uc i The Tho court ruled out the statement |