Show OBJECTIONS TO COUNTY JITNEYS Representatives of Railroads i Voice Protests Before Salt Lake Commissioners I After prolonged dlf b by the tr I count county commission y yesterday afternoon after Her noon the proposed county Jitney ordinance was laid over o for tor further consideration until the return from California of of J J. J H. H tt Wheeler heeler chairman of the roads and bridges es 0 of or orthe the commission who Is ts attending the tho good roads convention In California Dan B B. Shields appeared for the Jitney owners owner who expressed themselves them them- selves a as nl satisfied w With wih th the Provisions of or the ordinance Opposition to th the ordinance was voiced by representatives of ot the Dingham fling Ding ham Garfield Railroad COmpan company the Jib Rio Grande and tho Sal Salt Lake Route noute HOlte These companies took the stand tant that the provisions pro of or If the tho orI ordinance or or- I art aro too liberal and that the operation of or the Jitneys was an unfair unfair uni un un- un- un i fair competition to tho the railroads be because be- be f cause the railroads paid heavy hea taxes for Improvement of ot the county roads and they did not ot think It proper to I permit Jitneys paying a ft comparative c comparatively I ly small tax for roid upkeep to tko take advantage d of the Irn Improved roved roads rOls to toI toi i compete with the ml railroads roads s In transI transportation trans trans- I I business 8 It I also argued that the tile provision provi provi- I slon sion requiring a R abond bond bon of or on every even auto nto used as a Jitney Is not of fUr fUr- amount to givE Ive proper protection protection tion ton to patrons The Jitney men argued that a a. bl bigger ger bond would be prohibit t lye tive t e. e |