Show PEACE OFFERING IS DECLINED IN nn t I Ii i f Mrs Lund Refuses to B Be Tempted by Flour Potatoes and a Partition Equal share in fourteen bushels o of r potatoes a sack of oC flour and count count- less other edibles and dinner ingredients Ingro ingre stored in Charles G. G Lund Lunda cellar cel cel- Jar lar proved insufficient to tl Induce Mrs Lund when she appeared in Judge C C. W. W divorce court yesterday to t return to her Zier husband hUBband Charles G. G Lund Mr Ir Lund was in tn court at the In Instance Int In- In I t stance of IiI Ills his wife wie on an order to show ho cause causa why lie he should hould not pay alimony tho divorce action acton to b be brought b by Mrs Ir Lund Ho Lie offered to tc take tala Mrs Mr Ir Lund back and made mado tho potatoes and ant other groceries as a peace I offering Ho He even Cn C offered to build a n partition In his hh house allowing his wife to live Jive on one side while he took the other This ran l arrangement ement did not appeal In nn any wn way to Mrs Irs Lund and the tho court ordered Lund Jund to pay py 20 O a month temporary almon alimony r Mrs Mr Lund Jund will wf go so to live l e with wih her grandmother I Troubles Trouble neI ned 1 Most Mont of ot tho the long time devoted to yesterdays yesterday's session of ot divorce court I wa was given over Q to the difficulties ot or I l orn 1 roll h having n left lofti rth her hr husbands husband's l 0 h home II in Canada wants temporary alimony pending ending a suit for tor d divorce vorce on the grounds o of cruelty f C She has ha been gone from rom rota tho marital homo honie In Alberta for about three years She ho said she Bbc was afraid arald to take tak her children and go back bade to live lve with Carroll 0 Carrol I You Vou regard him him as what is known a as a n gunman do you not r asked heri her i attorney torney I do said Mrs Carrol Carroll while her herl I spouse l seated next his attorney grinned Indulgently Indulgent Much uch dialogue was indulged in In b by witnesses cs attorneys and all ni hands in involved In- In ol cd in determining Carrolls Carroll's Carols Carol's finan financial del cial status in Canada Canada His attorney nought to quash yesterdays yesterday's inquiry by that the court had no Jurisdiction Suns Juris diction inasmuch as aH the defendant was wasa a L resident of Canada canad I DesPIte the legal war waged b by tho two sides yesterday It I developed elop d InI in inthe inthe I the testimony that since Carroll Carol cameto came cameto cameto to Salt Sal Lake the tho estranged husband and wife wie have ha met and passed the evening together The They oven en e went vent so tO far as to have havo their thom pictures taken talen to to- to gether ether Mr Mrs lr Carroll said she did it for the tlC sake sako of or the bat baby lor lion Her husband husband hus bus band said eald she never ne cr mentioned the bab baby S k More Alimony lola Iola Frances Griffin GI who since her divorce was WIS granted has married again t aln und and whose name Is now Irs GruLer Gruber appeared in court to ay a that 15 a I month was not enough to sUl supPort support sup sup- l port rl the two children by her hor former usland Walter Waiter W. W Griffin Mr Ir Grif- Grif fin wanted the final decree of ot divorce tJ modified I so 20 u that he may have o hn L posses posses- ad 0 U L Lit L WU JUU nn 1 ur IX In iii the year The Tie court modified the Lia 1 I final decree anI only so 80 tar far as to stipulate I that the 15 5 a month alimony was to 1 be bo used for the tho care of the children and und for tor no other purpose purpose Mrs Agnes Lund I tr Hogge was granted iri an n interlocutory decree of ot divorce tram from Roy fey and permission was given gl en her to assume her maiden name namo of or I Lund Final decrees of divorce were granted grant grant- ed in tho the following cases Julia Abell bel versus Temple Jeff Jet Abel Edith May ray Bircumshaw versus Butler Duter J J. J Bit Bit- cUlshaw ZIna C C. C Walker alker versus Syl Syl- vaster vester Walker and Alce Mice Alice B B. B versus Ho Roy I. I |