| Show i SALE SJ PRICE VAGUE TAGUE r GUE NEW MEW TRIAL RIAL ORDERED mt Court S st t Aside Jud Judgment in Stock toek Li m s ii It Beca Because use the specific price to bo pa paid Id IdI I for rOl or certain stock was not made mude clear cleal I the tho Judgment of the lower court In the time I case CaiO of G G. G C C. Pratt a against J. J P P. Paulson Paulson Paul Paul- son was set aside yesterday by the suI supreme su su- su- su I preme court and a n new trial of or the ac action uc- uc thin tion ordered The Time plaintiff sued to recover re i-c- cover er 1060 which he alleged ed thi the de defendant do- do had hull agreed to pay him him foi Cor ten shares of or the capital stock of a u corporation cor cur I in which both wore stock stock- holders The rite plaintiff was given gl I en judgment fOlI for fOl I 1831 63 the tho full Cull amount of oC the tho with Interest The defendant appealed anti and the higher court held lucid that sufficient sufficient sufficient suf suf- evidence e had hind not been presented In the trial In the tho lower court |