Show DOCTORS DOCTORS' ij TORS' TORS EVIDENCE IS COURT SAYS Refuses Retrial in Suit in Which Plaintiff I Jf Was as Not Examined Refusal by the plaintiff fn In a a. damage Knit fruit to submit to examination to determine de de- de- de termine tho the extent of ot the alleged Injury is not grounds for Cor the reversal rc of a district court judgment according to a ruling rulin- by the supreme court COUTt of ot Utah yesterday in the case of oC Libel Sharp A minor by Milo iJo R. R Sharp guardian against a the O Ogden Rapid Transit Transi t compan com com- pany pan Testimony showed that Ethel Sharp Shu-p. 17 years old was Vas in a street car when It collided with another car Her father filed suit for tor dama damages es alleging permanent nt injury The lower court award awarded d and the railroad company company com com- pany appealed Several Se exceptions to th the rulings of or tho the trial judge were made the tho chief chic one being that tho the alleged al al- al rl victim would not submit t to examination ex ex- ex animation during tho the trial trint The supreme court b MId held ld that the phy- phy testimony in tho the cae case was sufficient suf suf- and affirmed the judgment of oC the lower court |