Show l MAY Y TAKE TAIE AN APPEAL i Property c Owner On LItel to o Carry P Pv- Pv vinc v- v of inc Cn- Cn c to Supreme Court S Special to Tho The M Ogden Og Dec l 12 Twenty third street property owners who are objecting objecting- to the proposed paving of or that street be between between be- be tween ali and Washington avenue and who lost In their attempt to havo Ih the city restrained from proceeding with tho thA improvements J today indicated that the they would appeal the matter to the supreme court The protesting asked for and obtained thirty d days rs additional time in which to procure procure procure pro pro- cure a transcript of ot the testimony and file tile n bill of exceptions After the city advertised notice of ot Intention to pave Pae the street the abut- abut tors toTs objecting contended that the city I lt d lost Jurisdiction jurls The city commissioners commissioners commissioners commis commis- held the way was waa Cleared for forthe forthe the he P pavement nt and let the contract Tho The Protestants brought suit In the district court to restrain tho the city from proceed ins ing Jud Judge e N. N J. J Harris held tho city had jurisdiction |