Show V WATER A TER USERS MAKE TERMS Distribution Plan Is Arranged Pending Trial of Provo Case in November to The Tho n Republican Prove Pro April 2 After After Arter meeting to together to- to gether two days das as a committee for Cor litigants In the suit brou brought ht h by the tho Provo o Reservoir company compan against Provo Provo Pro Pro- vo 0 city and all of oC the canal companies using water from Crom tho the Provo river tho the attorneys agreed today to stipulations for Cor the distribution of or Provo Pro river water d during Irrl Irrigation atlon season and after making the stipulations an order of oC the court Jud Judge c Morgan postponed final filial hearing on tho the case caso until Novem Novem- ber The rhe case caso has created widespread ad I Interest six It Includes over o OO defend defend- cuts ants and city T. T I F. F Went Wentz was appointed the com om- commissioner missioner to servo serve until October 31 n at a salary of or Oo a month and such as assistants assistants assistants as- as as nl shall be he necessary ar are to bo be I appointed by tho the court court- Mr 1 Wentz I will have charge of oC the thc river r and amI will apportion th the water to users In Summit Sum Sum- Sum Summit mit Utah and Wasatch counties The waters to bo hl distributed must mast bo ho exclusive exclusive ex eX- of oC the waters turned Into tho the river from Crom the resi r the Weber eber river rive and tho the Ontario drain tunnel an anthe and the plaintiff Is li to have tho the use uso of or these waters water Whenever hene tho the natural flow Clow of oC the Provo 0 river rl shall recede in volume to cubic c Cc feet t a minute the Provo Pro Reservoir company y must cease using water from Crom tho the river and will then have havo only the tho water I tr from C tho the reservoirs reser reser- at the head of or tho the 1 and the Ontario drain tunnel Ind m l such other sources as aR It has developed Independently Independently nd- nd nth of oC the n main aln river cr An Any company compan affected h by the ruling in Is authorized d to make nako complaint tr if the court at nt any lIH time when It can be shown that t It H. Is rot gutting getting sufficient water for Cor reasonable necessities and the tho con commissioner will bo hI ord ordered to tomake tomake tomalee make malee up tip tho the deficit first fust from Crum an any excess c. tx cess ceu that may exist and If Ie there bo ho bono hono no excess then n from Crom the primary water users and from Crom plaintiffs w water supply I John Jelin D. D DIxon Is s to e the water I decreed to him and Caleb ranner Tanner last year the tho amount being cubic uble feet Ceet a I second It was also agreed reed and that Isaac Baum Daum who ho purchased ten shares of oC water from Henry lIem Walker hi 1 permitted to use that water below the thc da dam m. m The Pioneer Irrigation company T T. 1 W. W Allen lIen J J. J W Men Allen Samuel amuel J J. J II IL Murd MurdO le and John Ritchie who take tako the water from the tho river above the Wright ranch near Charlestown and whoso whose rights have havo never he been en determined will In- In permitted permit ted t to us use the water w as h heretofore as asno asno asno I no court has yet ct determined their rights and the tho seepage o tal takes practically all the water back bacle Into 1 the Tim Th commissioner lonc Is Js to have c the rl right light ht to regulate all waters tal taken en from the I river rhel by parties whose rights havo o a not be been n determined b by court He lie Is also aljo given Iven tho the authority to withhold the water from front an any company compan that refuses to pa pay Its portion l' l of tho the expenses of or orthe the comm and his assistants The rho water users will watch the thi workIng working work- work In Ing of oC the tho new order clo closely el as th the results results re- re hults of or tho the summers summer's Irrigation will have considerable bearing on the lilt case when It comes up for hearing In November No- No o- o vember cm ber |