OCR Text |
Show May 12, 1972 On Course Tedders mftllQok Continued from Page 2 tablet) throughout their tooth forming years. To date there has been only 1 small decayed surface in three sets of permanent teeth! They have no motteled enamel and no fluorosis. Two of them have competed in state championship swimming and all are in excellent health. I have now observed patients clinically with total fluoridation, with partial fluoridation, and without fluoridation for over eleven years of practice. Fluoridation does benefit the teeth! This is beyond question. The only cases of motteling I have seen (and there have been many) have come from persons who were raised where water supplies were naturally fluoridated, and that in amounts greatly exceeding recommended dosages. Even in these persons there was good health and absolutely no detrimental side effects observable. Sincerely, f Phillip H. Spencer, D.D.S. 394 So. Main St. Tooele, Utah CALL THEIR BLUFF I clearly recognize the coercive powers OHSA inspectors have because of their use of unrestrained federal power. But they have no legal power. Consequently, they cannot legally fine you, order you to change your manner of operation, or close down your business. If they threaten to, call their bluff! Make them get an order from a competent court of law, showing cause why their action should be enforced. If a judge JOE H. FERGUSON Candidate for United States Congress First District, Utah gives such an order, whether by accident its constitutionality. If OHSA bureaucrats impose a fine on you, dare them to try and collect it. If they try to attach your bank account, you will have an excellent lawsuit against both them and the bank. OHSA Unfriendly LETS DEMAND OUR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS The only way any people ever preserve their rights against arbitrary and dictatorial action of government agents is by demanding them. We have allowed the abuse and usurpation of power to reach a dangerous state. But OHSA is the last straw. It is time for all Americans to rise up in opposition to these usurpers of power and in support of our constitutional guarantees. If we allow raw, unrestrained power such as is exercised by OHSA to grow and strengthen itself by exercise upon the citizens, we can reach a state where return to freedom will be impossible. I fear that we are dangerously near that state now and we will suffer tragic consequences if we allow it to continue. Inspector The inspectors and bureaucrats who administer the Occupational Health and Safety Act (OHSA) of 1970 have no legal power to enforce their demands. All of their rules violate the Constitution and are therefore null and void for any legal purpose. Anything they .do to you, then, is illegal. -- camouflage of the OHSA rules, their acts are revealed as being no different than those of a common criminal. Consequently, every American who wants to preserve the law of the land, the Constitution, should immediately file a lawsuit against any OHSA inspectors who violate his constitutional guarantees. I would like to see a hundred thousand lawsuits against OHSA dictators filed immediately all over America. And sue them personally, not as agents of the United States government. of the or by ignorance, challenge How to Sue Your When stripped Page 3 The UTAH INDEPENDENT quasi-leg-al ORGANIZE AGAINST OHSA We need a nation-wid- e organization to assist business operators in processing lawsuits against OHSA bureaucrats and to fight for the repeal of OHSA. If you are interested, please address letters to the address below or contact me by phone at (801) All contributions and inquiries should be addressed to: 756-445- 2. Editors Note We . appreciate Dr. Spencer taking time out to write. His. letter deserves to be answered. First, when one is FOR free- dom be is automatically AGAINST anything that would limit bis freedom. Today, many individuals and groups are trying to push us into further controls with its attendant loss of freedom. Our Founding Fathers fought to set up a government that would preserve freedom. Since that time we have been on the retrograde path in that respect. So, being FOR the Constitution and FOR freedom, quite naturally we must be AGAINST anything which would infringe our rights as free men. Unfortunately, today the advocates of slavery are more active than the advocates of freedom. Consequently, freedom is having to fight for its life, stay alive. The idea that we must be FOR something and not AGAINST is simply a play on words that has become so popular today as to almost be a cliche. As far as fluoridation itself is concerned. Dr. Spencer is doing exactly as the Utah Independent suggests. He is individually treating bis own children. With that we have no argument. Our argument is with somebody who wants to take control of the water supply and force all of us to be treated with fluoride whether or not we even have teeth. results from The. long-teringesting fluoride are still negative, or at least in question, so far as we can determine. Furthermore, the random prescribing of drugs to whole populations who are to administer it to themselves individually in admittedly different amounts still does not make sense to us, and probably never will. m So again, Doctor, you are properly within your rights to treat your children and patients, but please, dont force that treat-- , mentonus. OHSA ACTS CONSTITUTE ABUSE OF PROCESS One ground on which to sue an OHSA agent is called abuse of process. Briefly, this means the use of coercive force of a law to force a person to do something that you cannot force him to do legally. Since every OHSA act is illegal, every action constitutes abuse of process, and a lawsuit should be filed in each case. Ferguson For Congress Committee P.O. Box 5 1 1 Pleasant Grove, Utah 84062 t Next Week: Sovereign Immunity: Quasi-Leg- al Protection for Criminal Government Agents. STRAIGHT TALK has virtually destroyed the conservative movement. Nixon is more conservative than Humphrey like Brezhnov is more conservative than Mao TOM ANDERSON Tse-tun- The g. Middle-of-the-road- part, the editorial said: Conservatives are now badly split, again, Wallace vs. Nixon. Wallace Actually, neither nor conservative. Nixon Wallace is a claims there's not ten cents worth of difference between and Democrats. is: But there Humphrey is a Socialist by compulsion and Nixon is a Socialist by compromise. Humphrey would collectivize us at 100 miles per hour and Nixon would collectivize us at 50 miles per hour. Which is worse? The destination is the same. And Republicans more Americans would wake up at the breakneck speed. The road to hell (which some of us rednecks still believe in) is a slow, steady and moderate descent. Wallace is a protest against the Establishment. Unlike Nixon and Humphrey, he is against the international-banke- r, Eastern Establishment, which is merging us with the enemy. And he's for America and local self-governme- nt. is Humphrey than conservative more Gene McCarthy, and Lenin was more conservative than Marx. To 'liberals,' morality doesnt count. Expediency reigns. Everything is relative. Socialists like Humphrey and McCarthy are now called moderates' by the liberals. Get to the left of those guys and you fall off the world. On Vietnam Hubie is changing his mind. The new mind doesn't work any better is than the old one. Hubie-dov- e now any shedding responsibility for Vietnam, or any other war. Ever since. the draft board almost got him in World War II, Humphrey has been ' so draft conscious he wont even drink draft beer. He is for surrender and peace,' for making anti-Communis- m. not love, of The story gasbag Huberts life should be entitled Here With the Wind. Humphreys views and my views are parallel they wont even to meet, infinity. When the President read his I wont serve again announcement in private to Hubert, Hubert had a good cry (he thought it meant Bobby would get the nomination). Humphrey is like the chameleon that turned brown when placed on a brown rug and turned red when placed on a red rug, but who died a tragic death when they put him pn a Scotch plaid. On November 5 hell die and cry and cry and cry. The whirlwind has been sown and the harvest is at hand. Even Richard Nixon TV with his new makeup cant prevent it, nor can George Wallace. This anti-jow- ls . ed conservative Republicans now tell us Nixon is trying. Yes. Very trying. Norton Creek, Rt. 2, Gatlinburg, Tenn. 37738 This is an apology for an editorial I wrote in 1968. In so-call- . nation will never be saved by Presidents, or by mayors, even if by some quirk of fate we get good ones. We are on the brink of dictatorship, bankruptcy, anarchy and surrender mainly because we were brought there by our leaders. If they did it deliberately, they should be jailed or hung. If they brought it about unwittingly, they are fools who shouldnt be allowed elevator. to run a Thinking back on the Battle of Chicago, Humphrey, Muskie and Abernathy bring to mind the aphorism (that means pithy saying'): When shall men cast very long shadows, it is almost sundown. What I want to apologize for, dear readers, is for saying Humphrey would collectivize us at 100 miles per hour and Nixon would collectivize us at 50 miles per hour. self-servi- The no-nothin- the gs, Republicans, and moderates now love to ask Would you have rather us: had Humphrey? Certainly! Humphrey couldnt have embraced, subsidized and endorsed both major enemies, incurred a dollar deficit; n proposed bankrupting plan Norman Thomas once told us that we made more progress toward Socialism under Eisenhower than we did under either Truman or Roosevelt. And weve certainly come further toward Communism under Nixon than under either Kennedy or Johnson. Copyright 1972, The American Way Features ce yellow-do- g hundred-billio- er a fantastic family assistance Crossroads Report Considerable talk is heard these days about what is called Quality Education, and the measure of its quality being according to how much it costs. But some of our wisest leaders in earlier days got their education largely in schools out in the sticks where the total cost ran maybe $25 or $30 per pupil per term. Some who got their basic schooling this way went on to joints of higher learning and to great leadership. Others did as many do now: sprained their minds on advanced learning and went to Congress. without engendering impeachment proceedings. And thats an idea! The sure way to lose is with a phony conservative. Nixinger D.E. SCOTT Crossroads; U.S.A. ' |