OCR Text |
Show THE SALT LAKE TIMES FRIDAY, DECEMBER 31, 1971 State of Utah, on January 18, SHERIFF'S SALE 1972, at 12 oclock noon of said CITY COURT day that certain piece or parcel EXECUTION Conralt elerk of the District of real property situate in Salt CIVIL NO. 40713 Court or the respective ripen Lake County, State of Utah, de- In the City Court in and for the scribed as follows, to --wit: for farther information. County of Salt Lake, State of Beginning at a point 1116.5 Utah. feet South and 495 feet West LYON VAN LINES, INC., SUMMONS of the Northeast corner of Civil No. Plaintiff, the Southeast quarter of vs. In the District Court of Salt Section 25, Township 2 DATA-CA- P INTERNATIONAL, Lake County, State of Utah 1 West, Salt South, Range INC., ROWLAND Graphcomp SciFIVAS II, JOHN Lake Base and Meridian, and ences Corp., Plaintiff, running thence South 75 Defendant. vs. feet; thence West 132 feet; To be sold at Sheriffs Sale at GLORIA JEAN FIVAS, thence North 75 feet; thence the County Courthouse in the Defendant. East 132 feet, to the place City and County of Salt Lake, The State of Utah to the Above of beginning. State of Utah, on January 11, Named Defendant: with a of Together 1972, at 12 oclock noon of said way right You are hereby summoned and over: at a Beginning that certain or parcel point day to file an 'answer in required 676.5 feet South and 462 of real property piece situate in Salt to comthe attached writing feet West of the Northeast Lake County, State of Utah, deof with the Clerk the plaint corner of said Southeast scribed as follows, above entitled Court, and to quarter, and running thence Commencing on West line serve upon, or mail to Paul N. West 33 thence South feet; of O. S. L. right of way Cotro-Mane- s, Plaintiffs attor676.5 thence 33 East feet; 2071.85 ft. North and ney, 430 Judge Building, Salt thence North feet; 676.5 1380.12 feet, ft. West from Lake City, Utah 84111, a copy to the place of beginning. corner Section Southeast of said answer, within 20 days Purchase price lawin 2 South, payable 12, Township after service of this summons ful money of the United States. 1 West, Salt Lake Range upon you. Dated at Lake City, Utah, Base & Meridian, West If you fail so to do, judgment this 22nd Salt of 1971. 115.4 ft. to East line of D. December, day be taken against DELMAR L. LARSON, Sheriff by default will R. G. W. right of way; & you for the relief demanded in of Salt Lake County, State of 12 25' East 813.65 North said complaint, which has been Utah. 13.72 ft; North West ft; filed with the Clerk of said Court By Lt. Robert A. Stowe, 14 87 ft; North 35' East Deputy and a copy of which is hereto anDocket No. 52945 12 389.6 8' East ft; North nexed and herewith served upon G. Hal Taylor 36 30' East 29.52 ft; North you. for Plaintiff 12 25' East 123 ft.; North COTRO-MANEFANKHAU-SE- R Attorney Date of first publication De65 East 62.96 ft. thence & BEASLEY cember 24, 1971, curve to left (radius Cotro-Manalong By Paul N. (12-2- 4 1370 624 ft.; South 58 ft.) Attorney for Plaintiff 15' 304.5 ft.; East 66 East 430 Judge Building to NOTICE East OF bank of Little ft. SALE Salt Lake City, Utah 84111 Cottonwood To be sold on Monday, JanuCreek; South Dated December 9, 1971. 4 217.57 ft.; 46' West 1972 at 135 South Main ary 3, (12-1- 7 to right curve South along Street, Salt Lake City, Utah, at 12 2814.93 noon to ft.) 880.7 (radius SUMMONS partially foreclose 48' 23 30" West South chattel ft.; mortgage dated January Civil No. to less 901.79 ft. R. 8, James beginning, and 1970, given by In the District Court of Sail Charleen acres. street. 11.62 as Romney mortgagors Lake County, State of Utah to Murray First Thrift and Loan Commencing at steel peg HUISH JENSINE 3968.57 ft. North and 147.63 Co. as mortgagee and recorded Plaintiff, with Utah State Tax Commisft. East from Southeast V corner Section 12, Townsion, upon which is due on this JOHN HUISH the sum of $782.91, which ship 2 South, Range 1 West, Defendant. date covers Salt Lake Base & Meridian, the following described The State of Utah to the Above 558.06 ft.; South 29 West property: Named Defendant: 230.9 ft.; North West 54' 1963 Station Ford Wagon You are hereby summoned and 54 47' West 190.62 ft. to No. 3J72X173045 Serial required to file an answer in Dated this 20th day of DecemEast line of O. S. L. right writing to the attached com- ber, 1971. of way; South 4 44' West plaint with the Clerk of the MURRAY FIRST THRIFT 139.58 ft; South 5 48' West above entitled Court, and to AND LOAN CO. 107.92 ft. to North line of serve upon, or mail to William 2nd Avenue; East along By Robert Marcelis G. Shelton, Plaintiffs attorney, avenue 975.69 ft:4 North (12-2- 4 said at 314 Atlas Building, Salt Lake 6.73 ft.; North 36 West City, Utah, a copy of said an120.12 ft.; North 13 West NOTICE OF SALE swer, within 20 days after serv238.92 ft. to beginning. To be sold on January 3, 1972 ice of this summons upon you. acres. 6.05 If you fail so to do, judgment at 135 South Main Street, Salt Purchase price payable in lawto by default will be taken against Lake City, Utah, at 12 noon of the United States. ful money you for the relief demanded in partially foreclose chattel mortLake City, Utah, at Salt Dated said complaint, which has been gage dated February 18, 1971, this 13th of December, 1971. day mortas filed with the Clerk of said Court given by Darold Nerdin L. Sheriff DELMAR and a copy of which is hereto gagor to Murray First Thrift & of Salt Lake LARSON, of State County, annexed and herewith served Loan Company as mortgagee and Utah. recorded with Utah State Tax upon you. D. Wilkinson This is an action for divorce. Commission, upon which is due By Sgt. Michael Deputy on this date the sum of $566.43 Defendants address: No. 52729 Docket which covers the following de212 No Citron M. Thurber Anthony scribed property: Anaheim, California Attorney for Plaintiff Kawasaki 1968 DeMotorcycle Dated this 15th day of Date of first publication DeSerial No. S240793 cember, 1971. Dated this 22nd day of Decem- cember 17, 1971. WILLIAM G. SHELTON (12-1- 7 ber 1971. Attorney for Plaintiff MURRAY FIRST THRIFT 314 Atlas Building SHERIFFS SALE LOAN COMPANY AND Salt Lake City, Utah 84101 Robert Marcelis CITY COURT By (12-1- 7 (12-2- 4 ORDER OF SALE CIVIL NO. 41275 SHERIFFS SALE DISTRICT COURT SUMMONS BY PUBLICATION In the District Court of the Third Case No. 226923 ORDER OF SALE Judicial District in and for CIVIL NO 200 819 Court the County of Salt Lake, State In the District Juvenile of Utah. State Lake for Salt In the District Court of the Third County, R ENTERPRISES, P Hon. Judith Before of Utah, Judicial District in and for Plaintiff, F. Whitmer, Judge the County of Salt Lake, State VS. STATE OF UTAH, of Utah. JAMES P. CRIGER AND MRS. in the interest of EDITH W. JONES NAYLOR, JAMES P. CRIGER, his wife. THEODORE formerly known as Edith W. BIERSCHENK, Defendants. 7 Jones; and EDITH W. JONES Sale at sold at Sheriffs To be A person under eighteen years NAYLOR, Administratrix of in the Courthouse the County the Estate of Leslie Earl Jones, of age. Salt of Lake, and father TO: ULLI BIERSCHENK, County City also known as Leslie E. Jones, 11. on of the Utah, State A January proceeding concerning Deceased, said noon of 12 is 1972. oclock in at child named above pending Plaintiffs, the above named Court and an day that certain piece or parcel vs. DALE GARRY ADAMS and adjudication will be made which of real property situate in Salt ASENATH N. ADAMS, his may include the permanent ter- Lake County, State of Utah, deas follows, wife; ROBERT L. HOUSTON mination of all your parental scribed 602.14 ft. S fr N Vi Comm. and CONNIE HOUSTON, his rights. to Sec. Summoned cor. 14, T 3 S, R 1 E, SL hereby wife; AETNA FINANCE CO., You are said court in this S 252.8 before INFt; No. 73 deg Mer, a corporation; MILLERS appear Januof 11th W 132.47 ft. on 39 the ft; S 38 day TERNATIONAL. INC., doing county 84 deg N 1:30 P.M. oclock W 113.35 at 1972 ft; deg business as Goldmaster Origi- ary, 30 deg N Court of W Room this 93.93 25 ft Court in the ft; nal; SAMUEL R. PATENT and located at 3522 South 6th West, 45 N 83.83 E deg E ft; HARRY L. BORRIS, doing 18 ft 30 70.68 ft; N 19 deg business as Patent and Borris, Salt Lake City, Utah. Decem41 N in. E 112.41 ft; deg Dated this 7th day of a partnership, 34 ft 13 in E 89.62 ft; E Defendants. ber, 1971. DONNA M. REID 101.65 ft to beg. 1.12 Ac. To be sold at Sheriffs Sale at Clerk Purchase price payable in lawDeputy the County Courthouse in the (12-1- 0 ful money of the United States. City and County of Salt Lake, Miscellaneous Notices D-57- 81 d-b- -a to-w- it: S, es 4) 1-- 7) Dated at Salt Lake City, Utah, Defendants n this 14th day of December, 1971. 2739 South 91Q0 West address: DELMAR L. LARSON, Sheriff Magna, Utah of Salt Lake County, State of Dated this 21st day of Decern-be- r Utah. 1971 By Sgt. Michael D. Wilkinson WILLIAM G. SHELTON last-know- Deputy Attorney for Plaintiff Docket No. 52753 314 Atlas Building Golden W. Robbins Salt Lake City, Utah 84101 (12-2- 4 Attorney for Plaintiff Date of first publication December 17, 1971. SUMMONS BY PUBLICATION (12-1- 7 Case No. 229626 In the District Juvenile Court SUMMONS for Salt Lake County, State of Utah, Before Hon. Judith Civil No. In the District Court of Salt F. Whitmer, Judge STATE OF UTAH, Lake County, State of Utah in the interest of MARIA GOBER, TERESA WRIGHT Plaintiff, 2 vs. A person under eighteen years STEVE GOBER, Defendant. of age. The State of Utah to the Above TO: GARY WRIGHT, Father. A proceeding concerning the Named Defendant: You are hereby summoned and above named child is pending required to file an answer in in the above named Court and writing to the attached com- and adjudication will be made plaint with the Clerk of the which may include the permaabove entitled Court, and to nent termination of all your parserve upon, or mail to William ental rights. G. Shelton, Plaintiffs attorney, Y' u are hereby Summoned to at 314 Atlas Building, Salt Lake appear before this court in said City, Utah, a copy of said an- county on the 17th day of Febswer, within 20 days after serv- ruary, 1972 at 9:30 A.M. oclock ice of this summons upon you. in the Court Room of this Court If you fail so to do, judgment located at 3522 South 6th West, by default will be taken against Salt Lake City, Utah. Dated this 21st day of Decemyou for the relief demanded in said complaint, which has been ber 1071 filed with the Clerk of said Court DONNA M. REID and a copy of which is hereto Deputy Clerk (12-2- 4 annexed and herewith served upon you. This is an action to obtain a divorce. If It priding ... dial 364-846- 4 1-- 7) 1-1- 4) 1-1- 4) . D-43- 26 (10-23-0- 9) i D-58- 09 12-3- 1) PRESERVING FREEDOM TO ADVERTISE One of the toughest pro- - point out that the compel!-Hem- s of restraint in a Free tion shares those same Society is being able to know eradicating the alleged abuse, . r-- L N IT b 12-3- 1) 3) to-w- it: 12-3- 1) has acted illegally but because his product is not unique. In protection," the Federal TVade Commission is apparently ready to "pull the plug and wash a broad range of factual advertising claims down the drainpipe along 7) (6-18-6- In effect, the Wonder Bread case attempts to establish new interpretations of FTCs legal powers. The result would be to penalize a manufacturer not because he There's always the red danger that the proverbial baby will be washed down the drain with the dirty bathwater. In the name of "consumer 1-- 7) 1-- virtues, dearly whether we are threat ening precious liberties or Advertising has helped America to grow, with some of the fundame- tenets about our free economy. After destroying ntal the public's confidence in Wonder. Breads case, the company would have to stop about nutri- talking tion. .. something it's done for over 25 years . ! because other breads are just nutritious. Through the wide publicity given to unsupported chargee, FTC sacrificed a pioneer end leader in the long fight for better nutrition upon the altar of "consumer protection. It's a move that goes beyond "consumer protection to the dangerous point of consumer interference. Capital, not government, ii what creates jobs. Business is where capital comes from. the dynamic Advertising force which keeps business and the distribution system growing sparks the rest. During the 1970s the American example will be crucial to more efficient business, the FTC mobilization of human advertising industry. The recent action by the FTC, which would require Wonder Bread to stop advertising factual qualities which it process and proven communication techniques will be the would as prosecutor, judge emerge and jury for the entire happens to share with others, has no legal precedent. The essence of the FTC complaint is not alleged false advertising by Wonder Bread, but rather FTC's insistence that manufacturers of products which are similar in nature may not advertise specific benefits of their brands unless they also -- resources throughout the world. The competitive driving force for many emerging economies. Their national success will largely hinge on the crucial decision which we must make now to safeguard our free institutions. Unless FTC clarifies soi of its own policies and plains its attitudes and it conduct well surely economic freedom down drainpipe. ; |