Show APPEAL DENIED TO 10 OSGOOD FACTION IN THE COLORADO FUEL LITIGATION ST ST. P PAUL Minn Nov ov 0 Judge I.-Judge 1 Judge Sanborn Sanborn San San- born In the United States Circuit Court of or Appeals Juts has refused to grant rant an appeal from the decision of ot Judge Caldwell Cald- Cald well of or the United States Circuit court courtIn In the district of at Colorado which or order ordered ordered or- or der dered d that a n. meeting of ot the stockholders ers of or the Colorado Fuel and Iron company com corn comI I pany under the supervision of or a n special special cial Ial Jn master appointed b by the court be beheld beheld held December for or the annual election election elec elec- tion Lion of or directors and The appeal from Judge JUde ells Caldwell's decision which was made In Denver October 2nd nd wn wa was sought b by Geor George e I. I F. F Bartlett one of ot the stockholders of ot tho the com company pan A writ of or supersedeas from the Interlocutory ord order r of ot Judge Caldwell Cald- Cald I well staying all proceedings until the I matter could be rear reargued In court was also asked b by th the plaintiff A stipulation stipulation stipulation tion by which an nn order granting an nn appeal and writ could be med flied In Denver Denver Den Den- ver Saturday afternoon should the court so decide had been heen arranged cd between between between be be- tween the opposing attorneys and yesterday yesterday yes yes- ar arguments In tho the ca case c were I heard at length The point upon which Judge Juds-c Sanborn based lila his decision arose late In the afternoon afternoon aft aft- when the arguments were al almost almost almost al- al most completed The Toe attention of at the court was called b by Attorney A. A M. M Stevenson of at Denver to a n paragraph paras In Inthe Inthe inthe the brief submitted wherein It Il was stated slated that on October 3rd the plaintiff had petitioned Judge Caldwell to grant an un appeal and writ of ot supersedeas and that the Judge Juds-c had denied It It upon the thc ground round that the order made by br the court was not final and was as therefore not Judge Sanborn stated I that It was a common rule amon among the Federal Jud Judges In ordinate co offices not to r reverse tl decisions made by their fellow tellow Judges of or the tine Rime mp court unless I some pome gross Jross error on the tho part of ot other Judges could be shown Judge Sanborn In his opinion says The question Is not whether a n. review rc of ot the ca case c shall or shall han not bo ho hallat had hall at some sonic future time but whether the review shall be ordered at al this time An order was secured on August Oth OthIn In the State court 1 of if C Colorado prohibiting prohibiting the holding of oC a meeting of or torn tarA at nt any time lime for any purpose The The- order of or the Judge o of the United States Circuit court KO to far dissolved this In Injunction Injunction injunction In- In junction as to permit and direct a meeting meet meet- ing hag of or the directors to be held for Cor the election of or officers o on December He lie cited authority to show sho that n a recent re revision of ot the law Ill deprived ed the Circuit Court of or Appeals of or the powei PO POCIto to grant appeals from the decision lon of another Judge In which an order refusing retus refus- In Ing to dissolve an Injunction had been made and held that It was applicable In this cn case e. e and upon these grounds ground refused the application for tor an nn appeal and writ |