Show r t I CASE AGAINST THE 1 tJ CE CEET ENT COMPANY I II 7 H I I The rite cose cae CU of George against the le Union l nion Portland Cement j company COmpall for damages aGes for or personal In Injuries 1 r juries s sustained while In the employ I I of ot the thc defendant will probably he be de dc d In lit the District Court Monday II after aHer three days ot of o Judicial j airing alrin 1 claims that while white he i iwas i iI II I I was employed In the plant of tun cement company ho he h was as so severely I i 1 burned that he has not yet ct fully reco o I croci cred from his Injuries despite the theP fact that the accident occurred nearly P t 1 I n a year ear ago a o The plaintiffs injuries wore yore due clue to his falling Into hot I which ho alleges the company had hadnot t not hot taken sufficient steps to SI guarilL aril arilI I r L While the time counsel couns l for the plaintiff 1 rested rented Its case caie Cl e about noon yesterday 1 the tho defense had not concluded Its ar aI argument when the court adjourned yesterday afternoon |