Show 1 MITCHELL IS TO u uIt SERVE DAYS It Jt is It 1 difficult for or people to pro pr 1 leet cot tt themselves against a thief If ff ho k Ie in Irl their house e and your appear mice alice was such as to gain for or you roll ou ad Into the home of Mrs Irs Good oaid oId Judge Murphy to C D U Mitchell MItchol Jn th passing nassing sentence co upon him for larceny larcen You are a young malt maa of more lilore than ordinary Intelligence ind t lid iid alight ought to be he able to make malte a n re respectable living In D any allY community Jl ii appears though that thal you OU have ha C no to make mako an honest bonest Hv liv In ing ng It looks as a though you ou want to I h b a thief and nothing more moie Tho sentence of the court Is IB that you pay paya a fine of ol o 80 or In lieu thereof servo Heno ISO days daya In the county jail This will give sho you time limo to reflect and perchance change chango your our When you ou get out of or Jail It would be well noil for you to start life ilk anew and something of oC yourself Instead of entertaining the Idea Ideo that you your r make a living stealing other peoples property go to work and make an nn honest living Friday Frida young Mitchell pleaded to the charge of o petit larceny the tiie complaint In the ABC ase alleging that tu on July Jul 2 ho no stole 22 worth oC of jewelry from the trunk of Mr Ir and Mrs Irs David Crockett Mitchells older old or brother was Implicated in the theft ns rH fl shown In th lit testimony given gen In lit hs ds hearing for grand larceny the two boys bos seemingly making malting the loot lootIng Ing Jn of places to which they the gain In Ingress ingress gress J n a business The young fellow has been in jail for about a n month pending tho action of the tho court but tho thu court was not nol Inclined to extend mercy merc In any an de do degree debrae gree brae BROTHER BOUND OVER Further testimony in the prelim preliminary inary Iary bar hearing of Earl B 13 Mitchell charged with grand larceny was wa taken in tho the municipal court yester yesterday yesterday day da relative to the value alue of the property alleged to have hao been een stolen and RB as to whether It was taken from fro In one ODe or more mora trunks Mr 11 and Mrs David Dald Crockett stated that the tho goods in court which they hud had previously identified as theirs orid which wore found In the posses eion vion of the tho defendant in Seattle wore yoro I stored In one trunk and that the box bo of in connection with the trunk contained nothing but books cind nd iid pictures Tho The attorney for the defense con contended tended that the value alue of the property stolen had not nol been proved to bo be worth 50 consequently the young man should not nol be held to answer the thc th charge of grand larceny before the district court The court how however however ever cr took a different view and or ordered ordered ordered dered that Mitchell bo ho held to await the tho action of the tho district court Ills Ilis lond was waR fixed at DOO jOO |