Show DISTRICT MILL OF JUSTICE still Grinding Away the bushed through andrew vs mary iary 0 C larsen larsell jury returned verdict for plain ti tiff ff in sum of thirty days given in which to prepare motion for new trial WEDNESDAY SEPT J vs U mark ark pletcher motion to costs denied L R rogers vs J S peterson et ct nl al jury trial waived and judgment re rendered a against aillet james S Peter peterson and jens C peterson for 37 CCO go A J chamberlain vs james hadfield adfield ll judgment rendered in favor of plaintiff for 1500 1 and nd interest 1 bodrero vs john toombs order made dismissing appeal with instructions to cretu return rn papers to to lower court F D Mc MilIen vs burch school district verdict for plaintiff for on oil motion of J N kimball order setting set 1 I aside verdict and cause to stand again for trial at n next ext torm term of court F C stiller miller vs AV B parkinson etal et al case continued bonnie bros Ys vs goo geo adams et ct al order dismissing action as to john U R edwards at plaintiffs costs joseph smith vs john 11 II bulloch et al no cause of action and jury jury returned verdict in favor of defendant for CM 20 james 11 bad vs jas aits hardman dismissed as justices court had no jurisdiction II 11 griffiths vs C C goodwin jury returned verdict of no cause for action but no costs allowed either party THURSDAY sl rt L 11 myers vs martin k bradder dismissed and papers ordered returned to justices court for exe for piece and identifies them as having been in her pos possession legeion for years tile the outcome will be looked forward to with interest cution of judgment C C goodwin goodwill vs VB J 11 davis da vis et at plaintiff allowed ten tell days in which to file amendment motion to di dismiss appeal denied elizabeth lane lang vs va J P dougherty ct al demurrer sustained and case cafe dismissed is as to defendants mark fletcher C C goodwin and I 1 V rapp bapp N L eccleson Ec kleson excused for term james frew et al vs v robert reeder defendant did not appear judgment rendered in favor of 0 plaintiff for 1292 30 3 principal and W interest emma bassett vs goo lemmons continued con linued for term janet S barker vs john barker defendant did not appear appeal and ap for divorce was waa grant granted cd yesterday morning the case of the people ct CC al vs maaz mckenzie fc et all al camo came up for consideration and occupied tile attention of the court the whole day an ali extra session of court was held at al last evening to dispose of it it will be remembered that this case has been before in logan loan court as on the oth of june this year tile tho examination of these parties was conducted by judge 0 smith who bound defend defendants defendant an ts over to the grand jury the cour court room was wag crowded all day with spectators the charge against mr and mrs mckenzie Ic Kenzie defendants is grand larceny a certain B A jeanc a hotel of idaho idabo falls fall alleging T that while defendants were in n his employ acting in the capacity of cooks in aforesaid hotel they did unlawfully and maliciously appropriate for their peculiar vice ar and LI benefit articles that did not belong to them and did belong to him these articles were produced in coultas court as evidence such as hats bats jach jackets ets ribbons shirts coats etc but not much in tile way of evidence liae has resulted as tile the complaining witness and his little daughter 1 say that the goods belong 0 to t them hell while mrs ales McK Ic enzio Kenzie takes piece |