Show THAT THAI PAVING REBATE the NEWS itself unable to understand the hoglo by which the city council reaches the conclusion that the money in excess of the cost ot 0 paving paw paid by abutting property owners shall not be ref to them the basis tor for the retinal ret cigal to rollad this money astound is found in the extraordinary argument that the street railway company has baa refused to pay its if portion of the tax and the conclusion we ore ume duale to if that in ID view of this latter fact the city has ha not dot received any more money anoney than the paving has cost and |