Show MRS HILTON PERSISTENT Wat Supreme Court to Compel Compe Hall HI to Confirm t Report A petition for tor a n writ of ot mandate has been filed In tho supreme court by Mrs Irl Anto Hilton to tl compel DIs Hall Hal to confirm the report of ot the commissioners appointed by b tha tho court curt to net apart Mrs Mra Hiltons dower Interest Inters In tho estate of ot Dr John H n Park deceased pursuant to tho opinion ion of ot tho court Which held that Mrs Mr Hilton waa WI tha tho lawful widow of ot Dr Park and la I entitled to of ot his estate esl te The Tho opinion of ot tho Iho supreme court was rendered In July and ald on May 8 1803 1903 Judge appointed three corn com commissioners missioners to apart Mm Mr I of ot tha tho estate On May Moy 11 1 i the commissioners filed their report lout but has Iu refused and still re refuses reu fuses u CI to confirm tho report and Ind thus deprives del rles Mrs Hilton of tho use of ot her property The petition states further That there Is IB no considerable amount of ot work to be done In passing IIa upon nt deciding said matter That W C Hall judge of ot said court has up tp to date dato hereof failed refused and now falls Ind refuses to decide pass upon confirm modify or 01 set oxide report rellon of ot said commis commissioner whatever or take any 01 action therein heroin That by hy reason renon of or tho failure and refusal refU al of ot sall defendant to net act as ns by law lal required and pus pass upon tho report of ot s ll commissioner within n n reasonable and proper time the tM plain tl tilt buy bau been locon greatly damaged In by having her property withheld from her ani being deprived of ot tho thoSe Se thereof to which she Is II by hy law In wen en entitled titled That It I Ig II the duty duo of ot said uld defend to pass and In some confirm modify mod It or set aside for cause the report of ot said commissioners thero no 10 disputed ques questions qUIS tOIS of ot fact involved In said lall matter mater tho same samo may be readily deter determined mined with wih the tho assistance n of the of ot authorities cited In the court That luring during all al of ot tho times herein before mentioned defendant has hal been able ablo to attend to his duties dutes as judge JuISt ot court and hus not been pre prevented vented from BO 80 doing for tOI causa caUso w That plaintiff plain tf by b her counsel has called caled the attention of ot the defendant to the tact fact that he has haR not lot decided or passed on commissioners report and requested him upon three different occasions to tl do EO on or about tho 1st day da of July 1943 1903 again on or about the flay of ot Sep 1903 and again on or about the day of ot January 1901 That plaintiff has no M plain speedy or adequate remedy In the ordinary course coure of ot law 11 Plaintiff further avers ler that the do de lay In or refusal to act pass upon or de decide cide elde upon said report of ot lal com cor missioners a u aforesaid Is II unreason able and unnecessary and U Is a n denial of ot plaintiffs right to have possession of or and enjoy her property which the tho law secures to her hr and hinders and prevents thc tho distribution to her of ot her hel lawful estate |