Show final arguments will 10 1 be headd on j dec 0 A telegram sy assay has been received by ey the state public utilities commission aff aft from 0 the inter state wv commerce com ms fsr abw mission asking wy if december 13 will 9 suit a the fi convenience af of the utah board as the fw date on which to bear 0 27 the ym oral ziss pleadings and ef arguments av a in 7 the railroad rate case y in which abw the ff carriers aff have appealed fisi to the interstate commerce commission v from the decision w aff as to railroad rales within assiff utah on coal and f 07 low ws wi grade ores ais there are diffy six arff other similar cases saw to be ff tried at 1 the same time in 1 7 washington and the utah fyie commis aa sion cw wired ava in reply that doe 13 is satisfactory but y that s they f wished to definitely yr know jaff the exact date of the 7 utah pleading w so that it might avi be arranged ff w to have a re presenta tive ff of the commission faw heard w ait wy the waff shippers will be represented aff at the hearing ri fy but whether a re aff 2 of the commission will go rests with the state board w of ex aff this will be the final r hearing fr in 0 aff A the aff famous appeal from the decision aay a sy of the public utilities commission tsy during the summer ivy when the o 0 rail v roads nere granted 5 a yav blanket ad vance by the interstate r fay commerce aalt commission but the state commis aff deiy a sion refused ay to awa geant increases T on ew coal and low grade ores handled vw wp the state ff one aff reaction a has fw already rw sir been heard from the increase by the inter state iff commerce commission the western faw idt pacific railroad petitioned off saturday 7 for permission 7 to reduce aw the rates allowed off waffy on shipments to ay as the increase azy it claims vav Is throttling s isy the salt industry and threatening to deprive the railroads assy of a lucrative business www asay other carriers ay besides those in agnew utah aa have ff appealed iw from the deci fv 70 sion of the interstate waff commerce 7 commission v v the case of now york aff ay being t decided against afef the state in utah however a showing wrey must first be 7 made before an increase ew can be granted while in new york it is different according to judge green esy 0 wood of the utah commission |